An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings
Liberals Explained
This is as good an explanation as any.
This Explains Liberalism
Today’s older liberals are the hippies from the 1960s. These people are the ones who protested the war in Vietnam, had love ins and smoked dope while adding little to the value of society. Attired in their tie dyed jeans and driving their VW Beetles, they caused social discord** everywhere they were. Those people had to eventually grow up (or older at least) and they had to get jobs to pay their way through life (those who did not live on welfare). They infested academia and became professors so that they could fill the mush brained youth entrusted to them with liberal pablum. They ran for office so that they could force their social policies and failed liberal ideology upon us.
No doubt there will be those who disagree, but hey, there are always are ‘dissenters’.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
I know what you mean about “dissenters.” 29% of Americans think Bush is doing a good job.
One problem with those polls, and the folks who take them, is they tend to look at just one issue, two at the most. They don’t consider the overall job. If you ask me about Bush on the ‘immigration’ issue, I’d tell you flat out that he sucks. If you ask me on taxes, I’d say excellent!
And besides, the whole thing was satire. I know some major conservative who did a little toking in their youth.
Plus, if memory serves, polls break down thusly:
If I respond “excellent” or “good,” I’m considered to “approve.”
However, “disapprove” includes both “poor” AND “FAIR.”
Meaning, though fair is weak approval, it’s still approval.
A more accurate set of choices would be something like: Excellent, Good, Disappointing, Awful.
Cal, I’m waiting for you to be prez so you can set ‘em all straight! LOL
We’ll see…