Comments on: Federal Judge Violates 1st Amendment?

By: olbroad

olbroad — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:47:01 +0000

@Maggie Thornton:

Ya ever feel like spoon feeding the Constitution to some of these jackasses? With a pitchfork?

By: Maggie Thornton

Maggie Thornton — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:56:45 +0000

Stop the ACLU Blogburst – Court Gives “Say So” Over Literature to ACLU – July 8, 2008
“In fact, the federal judge said…the ACLU must be able to have the say-so over whether religious literature can be distributed

Kate, when the judge says the ACLU “must be” able, is she 1) pondering or is she saying, 2) they darn well do have the say-so? Hmmmmm, yep, it’s number 2, all right – in so many ways.

Maggie
Maggie’s Notebook

By: olbroad

olbroad — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:50:15 +0000

@Trail-Mix:

It looks like it’s coming to that, in the not very distant future. We already see people just standing there with their thumbs up their butts while courts make a mockery of our Constitution.

By: Trail-Mix

Trail-Mix — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:23:20 +0000

Three words to describe my feelings on this and all the other situations like it…”Locked and Loaded!”

By: ACLU Given ‘Veto Power’ Over Free-Speech Rights : Stop The ACLU

ACLU Given ‘Veto Power’ Over Free-Speech Rights : Stop The ACLU — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:57:02 +0000

[...] tip to Kate who sums this up: If this is allowed to stand, you can be damn sure it won’t be the last time you see YOUR freedom [...]