An Ol' Broad's Ramblings

UAW Handout

13 November 2008, 10:59 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Congress, Dhimmicrats, Economy, silent E.

This is pretty much a no brainer. Yeah I know, the execs get paid too much, but the fact is that union contracts and the auto companies operating with a technologically inept status quo mentality is what’s driving these companies in the tank.

CNSNews.com

It is a mistake to use part of the $700-billion rescue package to reward high-tax, non-right-to-work states such as Michigan, says Peter Flaherty, President of the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC).

“The automaker bailout is actually a UAW bailout,” Flaherty said. “The union will not allow companies to deploy capital in ways that the market would dictate, such as closing plants and layoffs.”

Under Frank’s legislation, car companies receiving bailout money would face tougher restrictions on executive pay and dividends to their shareholders, the A.P. reported.

NLPC says the UAW wants additional taxpayer money to enrich health and retirement plans it controls. Indeed, UAW President Ron Gettelfinger has urged Congress to act immediately to provide a separate, additional $25 billion in loans so auto companies can meet their health care obligations to more than 780,000 retirees and dependents.

President-elect Obama faces a dilemma, Flaherty said. “If he provides a short-term fix now on the UAW’s terms, these companies are doomed. Later, he will face requests for even more taxpayer money.”

NLPC said the automakers’ biggest problem is union contracts. Stock prices drop when shares are overvalued, but union contracts stay the same, the group noted.

To subsidize these contracts is unfair to other automakers – even foreign automakers — operating in the United States. “It was foreign companies that brought hybrids to market,” Flaherty noted.

“If the purpose (of the requested bailout) is to save jobs, then automakers are nothing more than jobs programs. There are more efficient ways to create jobs, like cutting taxes,” Flaherty concluded.

Like I said in a previous post…. Let em crash…. Let them file for bankruptcy, nullify the union contracts and start fresh.

Cross post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
EmailDeliciousFacebookStumbleUponLinkedInShare

1 Comment »

  1. ACR. 15 November 2008, 1:11 pm

    It looks like the folks in DC are hell-bent to give the stimulus package another try seeing as the first one didn’t have any real effect.
     
    This time it’s the car industry.
     
    While the sanity of blowing cash around and running the national debt up even further is questionable; it seems inevitable – so<b> this time let’s target unemployment, create AMERICAN jobs and pump up the economy all at one time.</b>
     
     
    <b>Consider the following:</b>
     
    Manufacturing costs of motor vehicles are 65% labor (i.e.: W-2 income), that’s not all direct but due to suppliers. GM alone has over <b>1300</b> suppliers. (That’s a lot of jobs!)
     
    1 in 10 Americans makes all or part of their income due to the automobile industry.
     
    Money turns over 5 times in a year.
    Thus a vehicle with a manufacturing cost of 20K produces 13,500 in W-2 income which in turn becomes a total of 65K in 12 months due to the 5 turnovers.
    (This isn’t magic, it’s simply how the economy works.)
     
    Our domestic car makers are saddled with legacy costs, most of which will reduce dramatically in 2010 due to contract changes. They need to survive to get there.
     
    Our own over-zealous government with a virtual alphabet soup of regulatory agencies has been no help either.
    Foreign competitors have worked off-shore collectively to meet various US gov’t. imposed emission and safety standards, thus dramatically reducing those R&D costs. American car companies are prohibited from that by our FTC.
     
    <b>Make no mistake</b>; it’s no surprise that <i>once again government has been a <b>major part of the problem.</I></b>
     
    <b>Here’s the solution.</b>
     
    Instead of either shipping cases of cash off to car makers; or sending us all another check:
     
    Send out a voucher for say $1,000 good on a motor vehicle for the percentage of the vehicle that’s domestic. (Civic = 70% Ford Explorer=80%)
     
    Let those not interested in a new car sell or give away their vouchers (Ebay would be loaded with them in no time flat) and those that are so inclined can use as many as they can get their hands on up to the full MSRP of the vehicle.
     
    This would bail out the car industry without giving them a dime directly
    Further it would reduce the overall age of the nation’s cars which would in turn; <b>
    increase overall fuel economy </b> &  <b>decrease pollution.</b>
     
    <b>Strengthen the dollar!</b>
     
    Since vehicles with a higher domestic content would be moving better this would reduce our imports, strengthening our dollar which would in turn further reduce what we pay for anything imported …<b>like gas!</b>
     
     
    <b>Jobs</b>
     
    Instead of simply bailing out a few big companies, this would cause such a run that it would create employment throughout the industry affecting over 1300 suppliers and their workers.
    That would give the economy good swift kick right where it needs one!
     
    <b>Pays for itself!</b>
     
    Since money turns over 5 times, and the vouchers are only good for the domestic content of the vehicle, every dime would be spent in the United States creating taxable income.
    What is the income tax on 65,000 anyway?
    (Remember? 20K manufacturing cost = $13,500 W-2 income x 5 = $65,000)
     
     
    <A href=”http://authentic-connecticut-republican.blogspot.com/2008/11/another-stimulus-package.html”><i>Another Stimulus Package?</a></i>
     
    I’m sure you’ll agree that this makes more sense than simply sending out checks; many of which will be used to buy new flat screen TV’s usually made in Malaysia or some such place.