An Ol' Broad's Ramblings

Insanity!

26 March 2009, 7:35 pm. 26 Comments. Filed under Feckless Weasels, Moonbats & Other Animals, War on Terror.

Terror inmates may be released in US: intel chief

President Barack Obama’s intelligence chief confirmed Thursday that some Guantanamo inmates may be released on US soil and receive assistance to return to society.

“If we are to release them in the United States, we need some sort of assistance for them to start a new life,” said National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair at his first press conference.

“You can’t just put them on the street,” he added. “All that is work in progress.”

Assistance? From whom? Do they expect us, YOU and I, to support them?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
EmailDeliciousFacebookStumbleUponLinkedInShare

26 Comments »

  1. drjim. 26 March 2009, 8:23 pm

    Ummmm….how’s 230 grains of FMJ?

  2. olbroad. 26 March 2009, 8:52 pm

    Sounds reasonable to me.

  3. HeatherRadish. 26 March 2009, 10:35 pm

    Quite a few Democrat Congresspeople and “anti-war” socialist celebrities with extra houses. Surely they can back up their rhetoric with a little compulsory public service. They can work together to give the releasees a place to stay, learn a little about their beautiful and superior culture, hook them up with a trainer to lose that weight they’ve gained from being fed too well…someone call FOX and pitch it as a reality show.

  4. drjim. 26 March 2009, 10:38 pm

    A most excellent idea. Let them put their money where their (big) mouths are.

  5. Chris from Racine. 27 March 2009, 8:54 am

    Dammit woman – you beat me to this one…

  6. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 8:55 am

    Gotta strike while the iron is hot! Heh.

  7. Chris from Racine. 27 March 2009, 8:59 am

    Well, as I said yesterday, SOME of us have to work for a living! :P

  8. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 9:00 am

    LOL Well, doesn’t mean you can’t post your own thoughts on the same issue y’know!

  9. carrie. 27 March 2009, 11:21 am

    If we imprisoned them wrongly, then YES we should set an example and help them.

    my two cents.

  10. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 12:06 pm

    @carrie
    Now, what makes you think they were imprisoned “wrongly”?

  11. Chris from Racine. 27 March 2009, 12:55 pm

    @olbroad Very true. Right now I’m fairly incapable of thinking though! ;)

  12. carrie. 27 March 2009, 2:32 pm

    It’s finally coming to light that many people have been detained there with absolutely no proof that they were involved anything more nefarious than living in a battle area.

    Yes. We should help those whom we stole years from their life.

  13. kilmon1. 27 March 2009, 2:48 pm

    This carrie twit should take a flight . Any one taken on the field of battel is put where they need to be , a better option is a 6 over them . As far as our dickhead bHUSSEINo AND HIS SLIME NOTHINGS the shoe sure fits ! Time to get set to impeach and remove anti-americans to be sure they will never be voted in office again . How about that ! This process is past due .

  14. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 2:50 pm

    Why does carrie remind me SO much of the very banned heather?

  15. carrie. 27 March 2009, 2:59 pm

    Don’t you think we can set a good example to the rest of the world if we own up to our mistakes? Mistakes such as detaining someone indefinitely with no charges?

  16. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 3:56 pm

    Here we go again!

    Ok, carrie, heather, or whatever you want to call yourself today….I don’t give a flip about what the rest of the world thinks. If you want to be a ONE WORLD robot, that is your prerogative. If you want to sing Kumbaya, go right ahead. But do not come around here sucking up the oxygen and expect rational people to follow along blindly.

    We have “set a good example to the rest of the world”. They don’t give a flip about freedom, and will whack your head off in a heartbeat. Or don’t you understand that? Should I s-p-e-l-l i-t o-u-t r-e-a-l s-l-o-w for you?

    Your comments will no longer be approved, so go play someplace else.

  17. drjim. 27 March 2009, 3:56 pm

    The rest of the world doesn’t give a rat’s behind about our “good example”. In case you’ve forgotten, there are EVIL people out there who would like nothing more than to come to this country, and kill every single one of us.
    They deserve no quarter.
    They deserve no more mercy than they would show us (ZERO).
    These people were detained because “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and acts like a duck, it’s probably a duck”.
    Things that would not “hold up in court” here in the USA *WILL* get you killed in other parts of the world.
    Get over trying to be “nice” to these vermin. They would happily slit your throat while your children watched.

  18. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 3:58 pm

    Heh. drjim, we must have been typing at the same time. :)

  19. Peter. 27 March 2009, 4:00 pm

    People like carrie and heather would have been smacked up alognside the head during World War II if they’d have suggested we treat the Nazis and the Japs the way they want the jihadists treated.

  20. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 4:04 pm

    Yep….Chamberlain was a lot like them (or her), and look what happened. If people like that wanna suck up to murderers, then by all means, she can let ‘em live with her….let HER support them….let HER get her throat slit in the middle of the night for her “kindness”.

  21. Jim Spice. 27 March 2009, 5:56 pm

    I’m neither Carrie and/nor Heather, but would agree with the her/their comment. If we put innocent people in Gitmo, we owe them. See Ex-Bush admin official: Many at Gitmo are innocentand Ex-State Dept. lawyer decries torture after 9/11 and realize these are your guys talking. Just the idea of $5,000 bounties and no evidence trail should raise very bright red flags.

    Are you guys suggesting there really could NOT be any innocents there, or are you saying there may be, but too bad, they are just collateral damage?

  22. Jim Spice. 27 March 2009, 6:00 pm

    I messed up that first link. Here they are again.

    Ex-Bush admin official: Many at Gitmo are innocent

    Ex-State Dept. lawyer decries torture after 9/11

  23. olbroad. 27 March 2009, 6:12 pm

    No, Jim, I know you are neither/nor. And you are quite welcome to agree with her, if you like. I don’t have to. Innocent? Well then, why were those folks there, on the battlefield? I’ll be perfectly honest, and this is no secret….I do not have any trust in Muslims. Yes, I am painting with a broad brush, but I have real good reasons for my distrust, and it started LONG before 9/11.

  24. HeatherRadish. 27 March 2009, 6:23 pm

    Jim, thanks for volunteering for the Adopt-an-Uighur Program! Be sure to remove all pork products and alcohol from your home before your family’s new houseguest arrives, but feel free to “make it up to them” any way you feel appropriate.

    (Here’s a clue…detainees who were deemed “innocent” were released under Bush. And most of them ended up right back on the battlefield.)

  25. Jim Spice. 28 March 2009, 2:02 am

    As for why they were there, say the next shepherd over has a better hill and prettier goats. Why not turn him in, no questions asked, and get a cool 5 grand to boot.

    As for whether I’d like to take them in myself? Hell no. Of the remaining 240 at Gitmo, we KNOW 2 dozen are the real deal. The other 216, who knows? We can’t tell the guilty from the innocent because the chain of evidence was so poorly maintained. Even the originally innocent ones are likely pretty bitter at this point. I’d never take the risk in the face of such uncertainty.

    So what do we do? Black helicopters late at night dropping them off in desolate locations in their countries of origin, perhaps? I don’t know. I just think it’s important to admit we screwed up.

  26. Jim Spice. 28 March 2009, 2:12 am

    And I forgot. Regarding the “most of them ended up right back on the battlefield” assertion, according to Pentagon in January, 61 released detainees are suspected of returning to the battlefield, though only 18 of those can be confirmed. Even accepting the higher figure, that’s 11%, hardly “most”.

    See: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE50C5JX20090113