An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
An Omission
Obama Drops Key Clause in Jerusalem Embassy Memo
Late on Friday The Washington Times’ Christian Bourge obtained a copy of Presidential Determination 2009-19, latest in a series of pro forma memos to the Secretary of State entitled “Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act.” This determination is a legally required waiver under said act to continue to delay the May 31, 1999 deadline for moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Nearly identical memos like this have been issued every six months for the last decade. Standard procedure, no big deal, right? Well in the Bush years the memo contained the sentence,
“My Administration remains committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem.”
The Obama team has edited that passage out. This explains the Friday evening release. Congress should revisit the Jerusalem Embassy Act and remove the loophole that has allowed this charade to continue for ten years. Meanwhile the president should explain exactly what his policy is on this issue, and why he is not committed to beginning the process of moving the embassy.
Real good question. Releasing such a statement at the beginning of the Jewish Sabbath is real interesting in, and of itself.
Personally, I’d like to know why the embassy is Tel Aviv. Jerusalem is the capital, right? Shouldn’t embassies be in the capital city of a country? We saw where it was suppose to be built. Nice spot. So, instead of building an embassy on this prime piece of real estate, it lays there, unused.
