Could all of those things you keep beating like a dead horse have been done without any help from the Democrat led congress? uh, nope.

My standards were: healthcare, education, transportation, banking / finance, information, energy.
Out of those you covered one, maybe two.
You obviously need to go back to school, and learn to count. Also in my standards were:
Flying a CUBAN NATIONAL FLAG in campaign offices, appointing 2 or 3 people who unabashedly proclaim themselves as COMMUNISTS, attending a chruch for 20 years that pushed anti- American sentiment, going on “Lets apologize for America to her enemies” tours, Saying we need to tax wealthy people more and “spread the wealth around”, etc.

We can all note how you seem to keep trying to dodge these things.
Did Bush HIRE people who proclaim themselves to be communists and have criminal records?? Or are tax cheats?
Hmm. Im gonna go with….no.

Also: You keep bleeting like a sheep over TARP:

[edit] Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP)
The systematic foreclosure prevention and mortgage modification program under this section shall be a program established by the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, that—

- Provides lenders and loan servicers with certain compensation to cover administrative costs for each loan modified according to the required standards; and
- Provides loss sharing or guarantees for certain losses incurred if a modified loan should subsequently re-default.

Yeah, thats a takeover of our country by the president. LOL Please point out where it says “President enacted to convert United states to communism”?
Ah, it doesnt. But Who does it mention? Oh yeah, Obama cronies.

Nice to see you keep proving my point as well.
Bushbushbushbushbushbush!! “Im cornered so Ill keep screaming about Bush and blaming everything on him from skin cancer to What Obama did!” Im sure you also run around blaming Hurricane Katrina and 9/11 on Bush too.

Me saying “Filling positions every other President filled is one thing, but most of these “czars” are NEWLY CREATED positions by Obama, without anyones approval, as in We the People… you know, his bosses?” -
is conceding?????
What….? What planet are you on?

Ive punched more holes in everything youve said than baby swiss cheese. If you cant come up with anything intelligent to say, dont bother wasting our time.
Youre a joke, and everyone can see it. Lay off the sauce.

The point, of course, is that your standards are absurd.

By the way, if you really think that a severe recession that began in the fourth quarter of 2007 can be reversed in two fiscal quarters, you really do not understand macroeconomics.

Good to see, however, that you have conceded on the “czar” lunacy.

ROFL

Once again, youre totally confusing a government takeover of everypart of a country (health, education, transportation, banking / finance, information, energy, etc) with a president doing bailouts, and creating debt. Im not a Bush supporter, but I call things as they are. To even imply that Bush was a communist, with what we have staring us in the face right now…….. I dont even think Dr Phil can help you if youre that out of touch with reality. Yeah, Bush believeing in National Security, cutting peoples taxes, trying to boost the economy (however mistaken he was) qualifies him as a communist. Riiiight.
Got any other examples of Bush being communist? cuz I got plenty more for Obama!
Flying a CUBAN NATIONAL FLAG in campaign offices, appointing 2 or 3 people who unabashedly proclaim themselves as COMMUNISTS, attending a chruch for 20 years that pushed anti- American sentiment, going on “Lets apologize for America to her enemies” tours, Saying we need to tax wealthy people more and “spread the wealth around”, etc. These are just for starters.

Filling positions every other President filled is one thing, but most of these “czars” are NEWLY CREATED positions by Obama, without anyones approval, as in We the People… you know, his bosses?

Also: thanks for proving my point that you cant even pass a little challenge any better than a 5 year old, and stop saying Bushbushbushbushbushbush. No different than any other braindead lib Ive argued with on the internet: youve got little “Bush”s floating around in your head and thats bout it. Sad.

Oh, I see. President Bush’s director of Faith-Based Initiatives was an aide. The person President Obama appointed to the same post is a “czar.” Bush’s Director of Drug Control Policy was an aide. Obama’s Director of Drug Control Policy is a “czar.” Bush’s Secretary of Education was an aide (?) Obama’s Secretary of Education is a “czar”.

Much clearer now. thanks.

Uh, I have news for you: President Obama did not take office last November.

2. I am afraid by the your standards President Bush was indeed a communist. Every one of these terrible things I mentioned was enacted by President Bush, not President Obama. To repeat:
(a) the AIG bailout ; b) the autumn 2008 auto bailout; c) the Autumn 2008 TARP legislation; d) the February 2008 Bear Stearns bridge loan to JPMorgan Chase; e) the 2008 Stimulus bill; and f) the massive run-up in the national debt and federal deficit between 2001 and 2008.

What a Red that Bush was! Down with the Czars!

*insert Twilight Zone theme here*

Who HAS been in office since last November, hit the ground running with bill after bill that have done NOTHING (I repeat NOTHING) to help our economy? Who could that be? George Bush? Nooo….. guess again! Our unemployment rate is higher now than it EVER was during Bush admin. Im sure youll say “thats Bushs fault”, but once again, who has had control of congress AND the white house for the past year?? NOT BUSH! Bush also did not approve or pass the stimulus (porkulus) package. You seriously have some issues.

Denial is not a river in Egypt. I used to be a liberal Democrat myself, but I actually stopped listening to the horrid media and dug into the truth for myself. Stop being a tool, and go learn the truth for yourself, and I dont mean from the Huffington Post or other left wing psychotic websites. Think for yourself.

I have another challenge for you, that Im sure youll fail. Try to get your point across in a manner that doesnt include blaming past presidents. The “Its Bushs fault for everything” doesnt fly anymore. The current admin has had PLENTY of time to fix anything they perceived as being broken by Bush. So try again.
I see this as one of those challenges you give a 5 year old like “lets see who can be quiet the longest”, and like them youll fail in your very next posting.
Buh-buh-buh-buh-Bush! Like a damn broken record.

2. the link that you keep putting up shows that most of the so-called “czars’ are cabinet officers (like Arne Duncan), or have otherwise been nominated to and confirmed by the United States Senate. the majority of the remainder are in positions created by many previous administrations, especially that of GW Bush. There is nothing secret, nothing special about the president appointing special assistants and envoys. Why is the Secretary of Education a “czar”, and not the Secretary of Transportation? Why is President Obama’s Director of Faith-Based Initiatives an evil “czar” and not the person who occupied the exact same post under President Bush? why would it be a violation of the Consitution for President Obama to have a special envoy to the Middle East, but not a violation for President Bush to appoint someone to the same position?

Looks like some sockpuppetry. Inventing IDs to support one’s own position.

And here’s that link once again.

2. The Bush Administration took the position in the Padilla case that it cold seize an American citizen, label him a “terrorist” or other threat to the national security, throw him in a navy brig, and deny him a trial or other habeus corpus rights. As Casy Stengel used to say, you could look it up. That power has now transferred to a Democratic administration. Now, no president, republican or democratic, would ever abuse such powers, right? If you disagree, you should make a generous donation to the ACLU.

3. “Warrantless” means without a search warrant. Once again, an assertion of presidential authority by President Bush and Vice-President Cheney in response to 9-11. Has that alleged constitutional authority lapsed?

Flexible view of civil liberties? You joking? I go by what the CONSTITUTION says. It isnt flexible. I could care less about whos in the executive branch. But since you mentioned it, Which Presidents throughout history have been the ones that kept us the safest, were the quickest to rise to our defense? Oh yeah…Republicans. This is the first of a couple times I see in your rambling that you really put your foot in your mouth.

Warrantless eavesdropping? Are you stupid, or just pretending? You dont think catching Terrorists before they pull off something like what happened on 9/11 is warranted?? Good gravy! You are actually saying here that you think handing over control of the internet is more important than preventing another 9/11? WOW.
You even refer to islamic radicals terrorists as “American citizens.” Yes, once again, lets protect the people that have seething hatred for us, and killed 3000 innocent American citizens on 9/11. Another foot in mouth moment.

Your 3rd foot in mouth moment (all in the same comment no less) is actually having the GALL to say
” As we effete liberal snobs said back then, be careful what you wish for.”
My reply to that is:
“As we blood-thirsty, money hungry, flag waving, gun toting conservatives said; When wanting to vote for HOPE and CHANGE, be careful what YOU wish for.”
lol!

I have a little surprise for you. Lets start by defining “communism.”

com?mu?nism??/?k?my??n?z?m/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kom-yuh-niz-uhm]

–noun 1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
2. (often initial capital letter) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
3. (initial capital letter) the principles and practices of the Communist party.
4. communalism.

Origin:
1835–45; < F communisme. See common, -ism
Dictionary.com Unabridged (copied and pasted directly)

Ok, now lets look at what Obamas been trying to do, in a quick nutshell, shall we?
1. Gain govt control of the banking / finance industry (Fannie and Freddy, anyone? bank bailouts?)
2. Gain govt control over transportation (after auto bailouts, Obama actually FIRED the General Motors president!)
3. Gain control of the Healthcare industry. (in the works)
4. Gain control of our energy / resources (Cap n trade, also in the works)
5. Gain govt control of our media, ability to acces / send information (He already has control of 90% of the mainstream media, theyre trying to silence the other 10% in any way possible, and now theyre going after the internet!)
Hmm. Media, Healthcare, finances, transportation, information, energy. Whats left? They already have education.

I may have forgotten something, but its late. I didnt even get to all the social programs weve had that are ruining the country, like social security, and the perversion / indoctrination thats going on in our schools.
In what way do those actions NOT present the conversion from a republic with some democracy, to a communist government? If Obama succeeds in all of the above listed, the government will have control of EVERYTHING that makes a country work!! We in the real world call this COMMUNISM, and a hostile takeover. You want to see how unwanted this all is? Watch the results in 2010. Heads are going to roll. Also watch what happens in DC on 9/12. You have some serious waking up to do.