An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings
Evil
Troubling portrait emerges of shooting suspect
His name appears on radical Internet postings. A fellow officer says he fought his deployment to Iraq and argued with soldiers who supported U.S. wars. He required counseling as a medical student because of problems with patients.
There are many unknowns about Nidal Malik Hasan, the man authorities say is responsible for the worst mass killing on a U.S. military base. Most of all, his motive. But details of his life and mindset, emerging from official sources and personal acquaintances, are troubling.
I’d seriously would like to know why the media is not telling us about this scum’s victims? I know one thing – he murdered 12 people, in cold blood, and wounded 31 more. But read the whole column anyway.
Hasan attended prayers regularly when he lived outside Washington, often in his Army uniform, said Faizul Khan, a former imam at a mosque Hasan attended in Silver Spring, Md. He said Hasan was a lifelong Muslim.
“I got the impression that he was a committed soldier,” Khan said. He spoke often with Hasan about Hasan’s desire for a wife.
On a form filled out by those seeking spouses through a program at the mosque, Hasan listed his birthplace as Arlington, Va., but his nationality as Palestinian, Khan said.
“I don’t know why he listed Palestinian,” Khan said, “He was not born in Palestine.”
Nothing stood out about Hasan as radical or extremist, Khan said.
I don’t know. I’d think not being born in the Middle East but claiming to be a Palestinian to be a bit….radical and extreme. If he was such a committed soldier, why did he feel the need to murder? Perhaps that just what some Muslims think is the right thing to do.
I’m not going to even mention that dog and pony show Obuzzard put on this afternoon.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!













He got winged by a WOMAN. That’s going to hurt him worse than the firing squad.
(Her name hasn’t been released yet–she was wounded but survived–but I want stuff named after her. A base, an elementary school, or at the very least new weapon.)
That woman is definitely a better ‘man’ than he could ever be.
I find it interesting that during World War II the Democrats confiscated the property of people Japanese ancestry, and imprisoned them on no evidence of disloyalty whatever. (I don’t remember ever hearing of an assertion that any of them had done anything that could be construed as disloyal. I could be wrong, surely there must have een one sonewhere.)
Here we have a man whos has declared war against us, advocated war against us, declared people have died in the war against to be heroes IN OUR ARMY!
Well, Larry…. it may sound cold of me, but now you know WHY we didnt allow any people of japanese heritage to serve in the armed forces during WWII…. we’re fighting radical muslims in 2 different countries now, and we allowed one to be roaming free in our military?
I say HELL YES to racial / relgious profiling.
This man is why.
Sometimes caution and common sense need to rule the day, as opposed to being “pc”.
If youre fighting a war against people screaming Allah, MAYBE you shouldnt allow one in the army, then act all shocked when he whips out some guns to blow people away?
Food for thought.
Not accurate sb. 100th Infantry Battalion, 442nd Regimental Combat Team, 522nd Field Artillery Battalion, and quite a few served in Military Intelligence.
And not a one ever said anything seditious to the best of my knowledge.
Those were what, Japanese?
I figured SOME japanese Americans had to at least be in the service when war broke out, at least, Im not entirely ignorant. I have actually studied WWII, but Ive always avoided the treatment of the japanese americans, etc. because Ive been interested in the strategies, the war itself, not the bleeding heart stories or the idiotic things we did to our own people. We segregated more than just Japanese, too.
I looked it up, and they indeed served in segregated units. They werent allowed to mingle / mix with other units. They didnt let them run amok in military bases. they kept a close watch on them, kept daily logs of their activities, etc.
Looking back it seemed very silly, but today were fighting an ideology, not just people with “slanted eyes and yellow skin”. An ideology that happens to follow along with people of a certain heritage, i.e. all the ones who flew planes into skyscrapers, have been on the most wanted list, etc etc. Which is alot scarier and a little harder to identify.
Which was my point.
http://www.sfmuseum.org/war/issei.html
The Japanese never went around yelling anti-American slogans.
There _IS_ a deference. The Japanese Internement was just simply wrong. It was wrong then, and it is wrong now in retrospect.
Internment of Moslems would also be wrong, Internemt of people yeling anti-american slogans makes some sense.
The down side of that is we would lose most our academic faculty and a lot of Congress.
Wait. “downside”?????
Exactly. I never said “lets round up everyone in America from the middle east” like we did the japanese americans, but having them run around in the military during a war in which were fighting them….. doesnt make much sense.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usshootingcrimemilitaryislam
Here ya go. “tolerance” in action, at its best.
I don’t remember the military being so PC back when. Growing up in an area that was full of soldiers and sailors, I’m finding this new Army a little disconcerting.
Next thing ya know, youll be seeing Army posters with Uncle Sam wearing a turban…..