An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings

Happy Monday

8 February 2010, 9:20 am. 18 Comments. Filed under Feckless Weasels, Weather.

Gee.  What a joy to wake up to more of algore’s ‘global warming’!  Not exactly like last Monday’s post, is it.  :?

I read they are expecting up to 5 inches, but not sure exactly where in the area.  All the schools are closed….again.  It looks like we’ve got about an inch, so far.  Now, you’d think this wouldn’t be a major deal.  Well, most places…in the north….it wouldn’t be, but down here, this is NOT normal!

The NORMAL temp for Podunk in February is 53 degrees.  Light jackets needed at most.  Normal low?  32, sometime in the middle of the night no doubt.

Average NORMAL snowfall, for an entire year….the green line:

Inch and a half.  Since we’ve moved here, we’ve had a dump of 8 inches….in March…a couple of times.

In case you weren’t aware, I believe Al Gore is a major ass, who lies through his ugly teeth, all to make a few million bucks!  And you can include all those so called representatives in D.C., who are falling for that BS in order to control our lives, in that mega ass category as well!

Hmmm….  I’m wondering….  If this keeps up, will we get some of that stimulus money to buy snow plows, provide jobs, so people around here can actually get to their jobs?  I mean those who still HAVE jobs.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
  • Share/Bookmark

18 Comments »

  1. robert. 8 February 2010, 10:38 am

    The people that think GW Bush stole the election according to Al Gore just needs to look out the window to see who is more reliable at their word.

  2. olbroad. 8 February 2010, 10:48 am

    Heh.  But don’t you know?  If an anaconda farts in the Amazon and causes ripples….it’s George Bush’s fault!  :P

  3. Shadowblitz70. 8 February 2010, 7:59 pm

    Those damn anacondas… we need more government regulation on them!  Thatll stop their earth destroying flatulence!

  4. jimspice. 9 February 2010, 9:12 am

    Again, that’s weather, not climate. This past January was the warmest on record globally.

  5. olbroad. 9 February 2010, 9:49 am

    jim, the climate changes.  It has for millions of years.  We’ve had ice ages.  We’ve had tropical ‘paradises’.  I’ve no doubt it will change again.  WE have no affect on the climate.  NONE.  Your point?  This type of weather is not normal for our part of the country.

  6. jimspice. 9 February 2010, 10:59 am

    “jim, the climate changes.  It has for millions of years.  We’ve had ice ages.  We’ve had tropical ‘paradises’.  I’ve no doubt it will change again.”

    We agree.

    “WE have no affect on the climate.”

    Here, we disagree, and this could be debated forever.

    But, my initial point is that when people use “weather” to bolster claims about “climate”, it demonstrates they don’t understand the difference. Look, if my side is right, and man’s pumping out of greenhouse gasses will warm the earth over and above what would have occurred naturally, there will still be snowstorms and record cold snaps. It’s just that they will be fewer and farther between. Right now, any given location is likely to experience cold near or beyond record conditions 2 to four times a year. If AGW is correct, those numbers would drop to once a year in about 50 years and about once every four years in about 100 years (that’s from memory so I may be off a bit).

    It wouldn’t be the first time a single species has affected global climate. After the carboniferous period, when much of the world’s carbon was actively circulating through the global life cycle at the earth’s surface (a la your tropical “paradise” reference) there was a HUGE population of blue-green algae that inhabited the world’s oceans. For whatever reason, there was an almost universal die off, and as the algae sank into the sediments of the ocean floor, the removal of that carbon from the system resulted in a cooling period, thus ending the carboniferous.  Not only that, but the algae, which was nicely sequestered in those sedimentary layers, because of the slipping and sliding of the earths plates, ended up being fed into subduction volcanos, very abruptly adding their carbon back into the surface cycles. Thus, a new warming period separated from its cause by millions of years.

    Well, what volcanoes can do in a day, man has been doing for the past 100+ years. Removing all that sequestered carbon from safely underground and adding it back to the surface cycle. To assume that this change would have no impact is a position I just can’t wrap my head around.
     

  7. olbroad. 9 February 2010, 11:20 am

    Nature has a way with dealing with darn most everything.  We expel carbon dioxide, the trees use it, expel oxygen, we breath.  :)

    Ok, seriously, you are referring to what the Earth/nature does.  We don’t control that.  We can’t.  We are insignificant in the grand scheme of things.  Climate change IS weather change.  The climate changes, therefore, the weather changes.  The earth cycles.  We cannot control this process.  What we can control are our own actions.  Don’t throw garbage on the side of the road, don’t dump crap in the rivers, etc.

    So, basically we don’t disagree on the changes, we just disagree that we have any control.  :D

  8. jimspice. 9 February 2010, 12:06 pm

    “We are insignificant in the grand scheme of things … We cannot control this process.”

    Control? No. Influence? Absolutely.

    It’s like the old “butterfly flaps its wings” thingy. Extremely complex systems can be drastically influenced by the smallest of inputs. Sand through an hourglass forms a nice little pile underneath until the conditions match up just right and one particular grain, special in to way, causes the whole pile to cascade downward. As the pile increases in size, no particular grain is guaranteed to make it fall, but the chance that any might increases.

    After one of the more recent ice ages, there was a huge freshwater lake that took up a large part of what is now Canada and the north part of the US. It was contained at the east end by a massive ice dam. For whatever reason, this dam eventually failed, and the entire contents of the lake washed into the ocean over a very short period of time. The differences in salinity and temperature screwed up the workings of the ocean’s conveyer belt, and the climate was in turn was knocked out of whack for thousands of years.

    Had humans, with their current level of technology, been around at the time, I have no doubt they would have been able to somehow destroy that dam prematurely had they been so inclined. A couple of carefully placed nukes would have done the trick. On the other hand, perhaps they might have been able to shore up the dam, and prevent the huge natural cataclismic event that followed.

    By the way, a “pure” scientist wouldn’t care either way. People would be seen as part of the natural process, and the proper role of science is simply to observe, explain and predict.

  9. olbroad. 9 February 2010, 12:35 pm

    Do you actually believe the EPA would have allowed that ice dam to have been shored up?  Or blown away?  Pfft!

    We can’t protect our borders because some yahoo has decided a mosquito is more important than national security, or some damn itty bitty fish is more important than feeding a nation.  Oh…off topic aren’t I.  Heh.  Ooops.  But it still relates.

    We can only truly influence our small surroundings.  Nature will do what nature does….whack the climate when it damn well pleases.

  10. jimspice. 9 February 2010, 1:36 pm

    Yeah, I know you can’t be swayed, and if that big lake were around today,  my bet is you’d be on the do-nothing side of that one too.

  11. olbroad. 9 February 2010, 1:39 pm

    Nature is a much more powerful force than either you or I.  :D   It’s even more powerful than the EPA!

  12. Shadowblitz70. 9 February 2010, 5:15 pm

    Jim – This past January was the warmest on record globally.

    Horse……. SHIT.

    Were having record low temperatures across America all winter long.
    So youre trying to tell everyone that while North America is having record low temps, the rest of the world is burning up?  Gimme a damn break. Use your head.
    Even if the temps in other countries WERE up (which Ill bet theyre not at all)  it would even out. You cant have record cold all over, then claim the overall temp went up. Why wouldnt it have gone up here as well?
    Its an idiotic argument that holds no water, let alone to the use of common sense.

    Also, feel free to list where you got this “scientific fact”.

  13. olbroad. 9 February 2010, 6:45 pm

    Thought I’d interject a little tidbit I forgot to mention previously….the Jamaicans were complaining about the ‘cold front’ that was coming down from the States.  Ok, to us, it wasn’t all that nippy, with a couple of exceptions, but to them, wearing jackets was a necessity.

  14. jimspice. 9 February 2010, 10:44 pm

    SBlitz:
     
    It’s quite clear you’ve made up your mind on this topic, and no amount of evidence would sway you. What’s more, you don’t trust scientists, you don’t trust government and you don’t trust the media, so what type of source could anyone possibly supply that would meet your standards. No, in your mind, “common sense” trumps science — nuff said. Why would I waste my time.
    For everyone else,  here’s a link to the raw data from UAH and NASA in a nice, friendly format. I’d suggest ticking the boxes next to 2010, 20-year average, 20-year record highs and 20-year record lows, selecting any altitude along the left and then clicking redraw.

  15. olbroad. 10 February 2010, 11:01 am

    Jim, the temperature has always fluctuated.  It doesn’t mean my truck is causing it.  :)   And yes, I did check out the link.  Why is it such sites never update their Java?  Sheesh!

  16. Shadowblitz70. 11 February 2010, 3:39 pm

    Jim, 
    I guess I will take my common sense and knowledge that in the past 50 years the “climatologists” have changed their minds about 10 times, they produce inconsistant data, which by the next year will be shown false by another piece of data, etc…. Ill take just THAT over BS fed to me by a corrupt media, lying sacks of crap like Al Gore (who is using people to get rich) special interest paid scientists (who have been caught recently LYING in a nice little bunch of emails!) our horrid Government which lies to us on a daily basis, and uninformed sheep who buy anything they hear from these sources.
    I find it sad you are unable to think for yourself, and seem to believe anything you hear.
    I will listen to any scientist who has ACTUAL information regarding this, ACTUALLY knows what hes talking about (not just looking at tree rings and guessing or PAID to scream global warming without producing HARD data from many verifiable resources), and whats funny is the few that actually know what theyre talking about will tell you global warming is a myth.

    A couple things for you to think about, since you only seem interesting in looking for ways to squirm out of answering questions:
    1. the global warming idiots like Al Gore started this nonsense as far back as the late 80’s.  Back then, they said we have 10 years and the earth is going to be ruined. They said things like “the fish in the oceans will all be gone”. They come back with this crap every 10 years or so. If Im not mistaken, we’re all still here, so is the earth, so are the fish, and everything is fine (cept not in the heads of people that are dumb enough to believe Al Gore.)Whats also funny is the majority of scientists back then said were headed for another ice age,  which leads me to:
    2. The earth’s core is cooling. It has been since it was formed, and continues to do so. So if the inner part of the planet is getting colder, do you really think that the outer part wont as well?  Things that make you go “hmmm.”
    3. The best information on climate and weather patterns we could possibly produce is all gathered from less than 50 years of data.

    50. Thats it.

    I will wager anything that you believe in evolution, and the line of thinking there is that the earth is millions upon millions of years old. So in 50 years we know FOR SURE, EXACTLY what the earth is doing and will do in the future? Come on.
    I can do this all day buddy.
    Common sense wont answer everything, but people need to start there before running off thinking we’re in a giant hollywood script and all gonna die from pickup trucks and cow farts.

  17. Shadowblitz70. 11 February 2010, 5:33 pm

    Ok, I waited til I was done beating you over the head with common sense (since you seem to lack ANY) and went and did what you suggested in your link.
    Youre officially a lost cause.
    You ACTUALLY provided a link that not only proves you wrong, but proves my point that you have no clue.
    I could argue the validity of the page, and the information on it (whoever made the page could put whatever information they wanted. It even makes a reference to wikipedia. (lol) But we’ll go with it for now.

    When I kept 2010 checked, and clicked redraw to compare it against other years, ( I started at ‘99…..’98  was incomplete… IMAGINE THAT!)

    I started at 25k ft. 99, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 were ALL warmer than 2010 in most or all of  january. So, I checked other altitudes.
    And funny enough, the lower I went, the warmer this january was compared to other years, but the HIGHER I went, the COLDER it was in comparison. Our weather isnt just on the surface, Jim… it actually starts at higher altitudes. If you paid attention in science, youd know that its not just on the surface. So you need to look at the whole picture.

    As with any other, youre a liberal who runs off with assumptions, media lies, conjecture and stretches of the truth wherever you can to try to appear to be right, instead of applying the TRUTH and COMMON SENSE along with correct complete data.

    If you want to buy bridges and swamps people are selling, go for it. Just dont expect anyone else to.

  18. jimspice. 12 February 2010 (5 weeks ago), 9:06 pm

    Sblitz:
     
    I thought I made it clear I wasn’t interested in debating with you. You would never admit defeat. What’s the point.