An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
What will our legacy be for our children, and many future generations? Will it be a strong Constitutional Republic, or will we find ourselves mired in the sewer of progressivism? Which honestly, isn’t all that progressive, since they seem to want to turn back the hands of time to a place in history where such policies saw the slaughter of millions of innocent people.
Contrary to what the left believes, Teddy Roosevelt is no hero to real conservatives. And Heaven knows, Woodrow Wilson was probably the third worst president this country has seen. The divisions we are seeing in the Republican Party today are rather reminiscent of that time, 100 hundred years ago. The party chose Mitt Romney, which, is ok I guess, but it would have been nice if there hadn’t been so many in the field to begin with, we could have had a stronger showing for a candidate that we ‘far right extremists’, aka Constitutional conservatives, would have been able to come together and support? Just a thought.
This convention, and those in recent years, really isn’t the type I remember watching on the idjit box with my dad. Yeah…I actually DID sit and watch them, and listened and learned, and at that age, was generally confused. To me, choices were simple, it was the grownups that always made it so complicated. Nothing seems to have changed all that much, but the excitement just isn’t there anymore. The party decides, and the delegates just go along.
This year, however, there seems to be a contingent of supporters who are bound and determined to give the opposition another term. Why? What will come of our country if they get their way? How many times have you read in a variety of places that “Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Barack Obama”?? I know I’ve seen it in many blog posts, columns, and on the various social networks. I really hate to break to those disillusioned folks, but no…actually…he can’t. And wouldn’t if he were the actual nominee. He is the Teddy Roosevelt to the Taft, and will hand the presidency to an almost clone of socialist Wilson.
I ask…I plead…I BEG! Please do not be the division that makes our house fall! (Mark 3:25)
Political Convention Drama Begins
This week’s Republican National Convention is already experiencing its own drama thanks to Tropical Storm Isaac, which has postponed most of the events until tomorrow. But this year marks the 100th anniversary of another Republican Convention embroiled in political drama of a different nature.
Unlike today’s conventions, which are little more than multi-day campaign rallies, at the 1912 affair in Chicago, 1,000 policemen stood by to make sure the delegates didn’t get out of hand. Strands of barbed wire lay concealed beneath the bunting on the speaker’s platform to keep disgruntled delegates from charging the stage.
The very nature of our Constitution and our democracy was at stake, as William Schambra explains in a new First Principles essay from The Heritage Foundation.
On one side was Teddy Roosevelt, who ran for President that year aiming to reshape American democracy. He thrashed lackluster incumbent William Howard Taft in the primary contests, declaring, “I believe in pure democracy.”
But his definition of “pure democracy” included upsetting the Constitution. He endorsed “certain governmental devices which will make the representatives of the people more easily and certainly responsible to the people’s will.” These reforms included the initiative, the referendum, the recall of elected officials and even judicial decisions, and the direct election of U.S. Senators.
On the other side were Taft (Roosevelt’s hand-picked successor in the White House just four years earlier) and the Republican leadership, including Senators Elihu Root of New York and Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts. They stood for the Constitution. Root and Lodge were great admirers and longtime friends of Roosevelt, but Roosevelt had sent shock waves through the Republican Party. Roosevelt had proposed a dramatic constitutional change that, according to Schambra, “posed the danger of undermining popular confidence in the institutions of government.” Therefore, Root, Lodge, and Taft were determined to deny Roosevelt the nomination at the 1912 Republican convention.
Unlike the typically bland convention keynote speeches designed to smooth feathers ruffled by the nominating contest and unite the party for the main event in November, Root’s keynote was a call to constitutional conservatism.
As Schambra notes, Root grounded the Republican Party in the Constitution, since it had been “born in protest against the extension of a system of human slavery approved and maintained by majorities.” After all, the GOP was the party of Abraham Lincoln, who had declared in his first inaugural address that “a majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations…is the only true sovereign of a free people.” The party’s duty, therefore, was not to reform the constitutional system but to “humbly and reverently seek for strength and wisdom to abide by the principles of the Constitution against the days of our temptation and weakness.”
Preventing Roosevelt from winning the Republican nomination, these first conservatives saved the party from a platform of radical constitutional reform. But it also meant losing the general election. Taft won only two states, and Democrat Woodrow Wilson became President, with Roosevelt coming in second.
“The result of the Convention was more important than the question of the election,” Root later said. Losing the general election did not supplant their “duty to hold the Republican Party firmly to the support of our constitutional system. Worse things can happen to a party than to be defeated.”
Root, Lodge, and Taft sacrificed their friendship with Roosevelt and victory in the general election to save the Constitution from a proposed overhaul. Constitutional conservatism began with saving the Republican Party from Teddy Roosevelt. It continues today with the fight to save America from a deeper descent into progressivism. Members of the Tea Party movement are the intellectual heirs of Root, Lodge, and Taft.
Thomas Jefferson wrote that “it is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigor.” In a new essay in Heritage’s Understanding America series, President Edwin J. Feulner explores the ways the American people are bound to preserve our republic.
It is up to us to ensure that we remain a virtuous and free people, Feulner writes, and to make sure our government stays faithful to the principles on which it was founded.
“This is partly a job for the free press and the ballot box,” Feulner writes, “but we will not be able to speak and vote in support of America’s founding principles if we forget what those principles are.”
As we watch the political party conventions, we have a duty to educate ourselves on the constitutional role of government and to compare that with what the candidates are saying. As Feulner says, “we have always an obligation to pass the inheritance of freedom on, unimpaired, to the next generation.”
The Origins and Revival of Constitutional Conservatism: 1912 and 2012, by William A. Schambra
What Is the Role of the People? By Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.