An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Archive for 17 November 2012
An Angry Black Man
by Lloyd Marcus
Returning home after two months on the road touring the country singing, speaking, writing, and campaigning to defeat Obama, I felt similar to a heartbroken soldier after losing a war. I trust God, but in all candor, I felt emotionally drained.
Shopping for salad stuff in Walmart, I focused on a sign — “Gold Bell Peppers $1.68 each.” To my surprise, I became extremely angry. As absurd as it sounds, $1.68 for one bell pepper was the straw that broke the camel’s back. It epitomized my frustration and anger over the idiocy of Obama voters. Why in the world would they allow Obama to continue destroying our country?
Food and gas costs continue to skyrocket. Obama’s war on domestic fuel, business, and the rich kills jobs. He has tripled our national debt. And yet, according to exit polls, 52% still believe that our poor economy is Bush’s fault.
An idiot relative said, “I voted for Obama because Romney will make us all Mormons.” A yahoo said, “I voted for free health care.” News flash, knucklehead: health care ain’t free.
Thank God Christmas is over a month away. I need time for God to give me the grace to forgive my black family. I am furious and extremely disappointed in them for voting skin color over Christian principles.
I feel like saying, “Don’t tell me about your commitment to Jesus Christ ever again. I don’t want to hear it!”
An Alternate Theory of Evolution
from The Bunker
I am a conspiracy theorist. I grew up in the 1960’s. No, I’m not going to bore you with the JFK assassination, that’s too easy. In my youth there were some popular sayings. One popular proclamation was, “Make Love not War” which was fun. Another was, “Question Everything” and that was much harder. I’m going to offer you a conspiracy theory of my own making. I’m going to use the Theory of Evolution to help you think outside the box. Grab some tinfoil and get ready to make a hat!
We all know about Charles Darwin and his little book, “On the Origin of the Species.” The influence on our society is without question.
Here are some significant historical events that shaped Intellectual thinking. They occurred around the same time period as Darwin’s book. They also had a very dramatic impact on educational theory and political thinking. If you are unfamiliar with any of these, just do an internet search for more insight.
In 1848 Karl Marx published “The Communist Manifesto.” It was hailed by the elite classes as a new beginning, a solution to all the worlds’ inequalities. One platform of his plan was that, “”Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people”. Marx didn’t think much about a belief in God.
In 1859 Charles Darwin published his book. Again, it was greeted as a new beginning, a solution to where we came from. It is still being taught to everyone today, as fact. God isn’t even in the picture.
In 1882 Friedrich Nietzsche publishes “The Gay Science” in which he proclaims that God is dead. He also furthers the advancement of nihilism, the belief that life is without meaning or purpose. The intellectual class goes wild with excitement.
In 1884 the Fabian Society is formed. I will let you do your own research on this group. Its socialist and collectivist political theory is still guiding the education system of this country. Read: “The Turning of the Tides.” It’s a free download.
In 1912 the rise of Eugenics began. Using Darwin’s evolution theory universities and government’s in Europe and the United States begin a systematic study of society looking for undesirable traits in humans. It was even tested in the Supreme Court in Buck vs. Bell, 1927
What do all these events have in common with the other? The evolutionary rise of socialist ideals in education and political thought began with Marx’s manifesto. Marx’s perfect society had no room for religion or God. Darwin’s theory provided a scientific explanation as to the origin of man. Nietzsche provided a philosophical reason for a meaningless life. My contention is that the theory of evolution is a weak scientific theory. However it is a powerful political theory couched in scientific gibberish.
Darwin was most likely sincere in his beliefs. But does it really make any logical sense? Before Darwin the belief in a Supreme Being or god’s went back millennia. The human species gazed in amazement at the world around them and understood that something more powerful than themselves shaped their existence. Am I to believe that one man, Darwin could negate the common understanding of the billions of soul’s that came before him?
Darwin’s little theory needed help. Socialists and collectivists grabbed hold of his idea’s and shaped them to further their political purposes. They pushed and continue to force this weak theory on the masses to destroy religious thought. It is sad to say that it has worked out pretty well for them.
In 1642 Isaac Newton was born, he wasn’t a “Sir” quite yet. He was a real scientist. Let me give you one of his lease known quotes, “Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that is or can be done.” Another little known fact is that two thirds of all of his papers stored at Cambridge University concern his studies of religion and the Bible. Sir Isaac was a mathematician; he was obsessed with the idea that the bible contained a code. Today it is known as “The Bible Code” and is worth looking into.
If I had to choose between two scientists; well, for me the pick is obvious.
How’s my conspiracy so far? I can teach you how to make a cool looking tinfoil hat!
As former CIA Director David Petraeus revealed new discrepancies Friday in the administration’s story over Libya, a dozen female House Democrats suggested Republicans’ criticism of U.N. ambassador Susan Rice over her Libya comments is instead rooted in sexism and racism.
“It is a shame that anytime something goes wrong, they pick on women and minorities,” Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, the next chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told reporters Friday at a Capitol Hill news conference.
Would you ignorant broads PLEASE grow the hell up!! No one gives a flying flip the color or gender of a liar. It is NOT sexism, or racism…your favorite word that has lost a great deal of meaning from the overuse….to criticize a person who goes out, as a representative of THIS administration, and repeats the same false information, over and over and over and over and over. No one is ‘picking on’ anyone. Throw your race card away, stop playing the victim and behave like grown ups! If you want to be a Congress critter…pull your big girl panties up and stop behaving like poor helpless children! You can’t have it both ways, ya hypocrites! All this BS coming from the biggest racists and sexists…..the DEMOCRATS!
The lawmakers escalated their defense of Rice after President Obama earlier in the week devoted part of his post-election press conference to challenging Rice’s critics.
Republicans, though, have stood by their concerns about Rice — continuing to question her repeated claim on Sept. 16 that the Libya attack was a “spontaneous” act tied to an anti-Islam film. Petraeus testified Friday that his agency originally pointed to “Al Qaeda involvement” — and according to Republican Rep. Peter King, that reference was somehow taken out by the time Rice discussed the issue on Sept. 16.
So, Obama says to come after him after the criticism of Rice? Ok…we can do that! Mr Obama, you are fired for being an incompetent boob! Who changed the wording of the statement from the CIA? If Rice got her talking points from YOU, then you are accountable for the BS she spread over all the Sunday morning blab fests. If she got her talking points from anyone in your administration, YOU are still responsible. All that continuous blaming the murders of four Americans on a YouTube video makes you look even MORE incompetent, since you KNEW that video had NOTHING to do with the attacks on our citizens.
Oh…but they are just bumps in the road. Silly me. I forgot! Your outrage is reserved for the criticism of a poor helpless female. If she is so helpless, then why the hell is she in the ambassador to the U.N.?? We don’t need wusses in any position of power. But then, we’re stuck with YOU, the biggest wimp of them all parading around as a phony POTUS, so I guess it’s the norm to have panty wetters.
Yep, I’m pretty disgusted with the selective outrage.