An Ol' Broad's Ramblings
Archive for Middle East
I had relatives who use to go to Beirut every year on vacation. Then, that beautiful city started to deteriorate, and became dangerous, especially for Christians. Why do you think my grandparents immigrated from Lebanon? Even in the late 1800s, the muslims were trying to eradicate anyone not muslim in that country. It did become more peaceful in the mid 1950s, so first generation Americans could go see the country their parents left, and where many relatives murdered.
So, watch this video, imagine what could have been, and remember, until there is complete destruction of the murderous thugs, there will be no peace….anywhere!
So, that piece of human excrement is now on U.S. soil, instead of chained in Gitmo, where he should be. Why is that? Well, apparently, this administration equates the murder of 4 American citizens to robbing the local liquor store. He should not be in a D.C. courthouse. He should be standing in front of a firing squad.
Just why is it that the leftist administration equate terrorism with common crimes? Terrorist attacks in foreign countries on American citizens and interests are NOT the same, and should never be treated the same. The attack on the Benghazi compounds were acts of war. What do you do with enemy combatants? Well, in my opinion, they should be executed. It’s not that complicated. Why has the U.S. government, over the years, turned away from logical actions, to a bunch of cowards, fearing to create ‘martyrs’? I don’t think they should be captured at all. To steal a phrase from previous generations, the only good terrorist is a DEAD terrorist!
Not only did they not transfer him to Gitmo, he now has Constitutional ‘rights’. Why? He’s not an American citizen. He should have NO rights under our laws. One bullet would have solved the whole problem…AFTER he was water boarded and gave up the names of his fellow barbarians.
Perhaps I’m getting jaded. Honestly, I don’t care if I offend anyone. I’m tired of tiptoeing around just because some muzzie POS is offended, or some insane liberal believes I’m a bigot. My concern is with America, and her citizens, NOT some low life, scum sucking, barbarian, or his/her feelings. Screw them all. One large glass field would solve the biggest problem in the world….islam!
It’s in your best interest to watch, and learn.
Gotta say it….Tamara Hall is a blithering idiot!
Genesis 15:18 In that same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land: from the river of Egypt unto the great river Euphrates.
Isaiah 57:21 There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked.
Ezekiel 13:10 And therefore, because they have deceived my people, saying, Peace, and there was no peace: and one built up a wall, and behold, the others daubed it with untempered mortar,
Ezekiel 37:22 And I will make them one people in the land, upon the mountains of Israel, and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two peoples, neither be divided anymore henceforth into two kingdoms.
Jeremiah 8:11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people with sweet words, saying, Peace, peace, when there is no peace.
Joel 3:2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people, and for mine heritage Israel: whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.
So, ya don’t think it makes a bit of difference when the U.S. pokes her nose into Israel’s business? Don’t think it pisses God off when others demand Israel go against His word? Here’s just a few examples of the consequences. There are more. Oh sure, there will be many who say one has nothing to do with the other, but do you really want to find out by pushing Bibi into acting like Sharon?
God has said don’t divide the land. This is the land that God gave to His people. The only divisions were to be between the 12 tribes. That’s it! And ya sure as hell don’t wanna piss of God! Are people so naive that they are unable to realize that the so called Palestinians don’t want peace with Israel? Read the quran! The WHOLE thing!
Quran (2:191-193) And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)
Quran (8:12) I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them
Quran (9:30) And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
Quran (47:35) Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,
From their own mouths, they have declared there will be no peace, no matter what Israel, or the rest of the world (especially the U.S.) says or does! “Our war with the descendants of the apes and pigs (i.e., Jews) is a war of religion and faith. Long Live Fatah!” [PA TV (Fatah), Jan. 9, 2012]
Sharon made a huge mistake by forcing people from their homes. I pray Bibi won’t make that same mistake! Ariel Sharon did many great things for Israel, and he will be remembered for the sacrifices he made in the many wars fought from Israel’s recognition by the UN. Islam will always be at war with Israel, with Jews, and Christians. It seems that’s their only purpose in life….to destroy anyone that doesn’t accept the pedophile prophet.
It’s time for people to snap out of their stupidity….Islam is NOT a “religion of peace”. It is a cult of hate! The so called Palestinians will never give up their quest to destroy Israel. Read the Hamas charter!
The Iranians aren’t saddened by the death of Sharon:
It’s not just in Israel that the muslims are instructed to murder:
Leaders of Pakistan’s most deadly terrorist organization issued a recent “fatwa” – an Islamic edict – ordering their followers to kill journalists and those believed to be spies for the West, saying they are enemies of Islam.
Journalists? Those people who write in favor of the muslims for the most part? Well, at least U.S. journalist, at the instruction of the administration, no doubt!
On Saturday afternoon an Arab stabbed a 30-year-old Hareidi-religious man in the neck by the Damascus Gate (Sha’ar Shechem) of the Old City in Jerusalem. The injured man was evacuated in moderate condition to Sha’arei Tzedek Hospital in the capital city.
The ‘lone wolves’ will become more active.
Islamic extremist groups in Syria with ties to Al Qaeda are trying to identify, recruit and train Americans and other Westerners who have traveled there to get them to carry out attacks when they return home, according to senior American intelligence and counterterrorism officials.
Don’t be surprised when you read about the slaughter of innocents in the U.S. The media won’t identify the terrorists as terrorists. The government will continue their lies of ‘lone wolves’ and the ‘religion of peace’.
Muslims will lie, cheat, and steal, to worm their way into power. They will murder at the drop of a hat. Giving them land, and expecting peace in return is a fool’s errand!
Yes, I know… I said I wouldn’t be posting anything for a while, but THIS had to be copy and pasted! I notice that Kerry has NOT retracted, and continues to act as an emissary for the muzzies. Not cool dude!
The Hon. John Kerry, U.S. Secretary of State,
The State Department,
November 8, 2013
Dear Secretary Kerry,
After listening to you declare repeatedly over the past weeks that “Israel’s settlements are illegitimate”, I respectfully wish to state, unequivocally, that you are mistaken and ill advised, both in law and in fact.
Pursuant to the “Oslo Accords”, and specifically the Israel-Palestinian Interim Agreement (1995), the “issue of settlements” is one of subjects to be negotiated in the permanent status negotiations. President Bill Clinton on behalf of the US, is signatory as witness to that agreement, together with the leaders of the EU, Russia, Egypt, Jordan and Norway.
Your statements serve to not only to prejudge this negotiating issue, but also to undermine the integrity of that agreement, as well as the very negotiations that you so enthusiastically advocate.
Your determination that Israel’s settlements are illegitimate cannot be legally substantiated. The oft-quoted prohibition on transferring population into occupied territory (Art. 49 of the 4th Geneva Convention) was, according to the International Committee Red Cross’s own official commentary of that convention, drafted in 1949 to prevent the forced, mass transfer of populations carried out by the Nazis in the Second World War. It was never intended to apply to Israel’s settlement activity. Attempts by the international community to attribute this article to Israel emanate from clear partisan motives, with which you, and the US are now identifying.
Upset at President Barack Obama’s policies on Iran and Syria, members of Saudi Arabia’s ruling family are threatening a rift with the United States that could take the alliance between Washington and the kingdom to its lowest point in years.
Saudi Arabia’s intelligence chief is vowing that the kingdom will make a ‘major shift’ in relations with the United States to protest perceived American inaction over Syria’s civil war as well as recent U.S. overtures to Iran, a source close to Saudi policy said on Tuesday.
Prince Bandar bin Sultan told European diplomats that the United States had failed to act effectively against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, was growing closer to Tehran, and had failed to back Saudi support for Bahrain when it crushed an anti-government revolt in 2011, the source said.
If the Saudis wants a war with Syria, why the blazes don’t they do it themselves? Why is it the responsibility of the U.S. to do their dirty work? Are we their servants? I don’t bleepin’ think so! And if I’m not mistaken, the UN is destroying all the manufacturing facilities for the chemical weapons, and the weapons themselves.
Apparently, they are supporting the islamists. That’s the only reason I can think of for them to get their knickers in a twist. They want Syria to be like them. Considering the Saudis murder their own citizens at random, for little reason, all religions other than islam, which is NOT a religion, but a cult, are illegal, and want to spread their evil, I can’t think of a single reason we should prop there sorry asses up. Yeah, they have oil, but then, so do we.
And by the way….there are no such thing as Palestinians! The “conflict” is between muslims and a country that has every right to exist, even though the muzzies want to destroy her. THEY are our ally, not any muzzie country, even if they claim to be.
Apparently, the pretender in chief hasn’t really been paying attention. Well, either that, or he just doesn’t give a damn. I mean, after all, they’re just Christians, so it doesn’t matter if they are threatened with being beheaded unless they convert, or out right murdered. He wants to help the ‘rebels’. And who is it that are killing Christians? That would be those same ‘rebels’ that Obama wants to arm in Syria. Lucky for him, it looks like Putin has given him a way out of the mess he has created for himself. The next time he blathers about ‘credibility‘, he might want to remember….he has none!
The administration, and some ‘human right’ group, are claiming that it was the Assad regime that was the culprit that used the WMDs. I have my doubts. I’m always very suspicious of any bunch that says they are a ‘human rights’ group. Where are these people when little girls are being brutalized?
The idea Obama wanted to give arms to those who have made no secret of their intent, no matter what name the group goes by, is beyond appalling! What’s even MORE appalling is the idea that our own CIA is busy, in Jordon, training these so called rebels, and no doubt helping them sneak into Syria to murder more innocent men, women, and children!
IF Assad agrees to Putin’s plan, and turns over the chemical weapons to the UN, or some other useless bunch of weasels, who’s to say that those same weasels won’t turn them over to some favored rogue nation to use on some other group of people they don’t much care for, like say….patriotic Americans?
So, I have a question: If Barack Hussein Obama arms the ‘rebels’, aka al Qaeda, al Nursa Front, etc., will he be guilty of aiding the enemy of the U.S.? Isn’t that treason?
It’s hard to tell who the players are without a program. Unfortunately, there isn’t one available. If you listen to the media, and yes, I am including FNC in with ‘the media’, the bad guy is Bashar al-Assad, the dictator of Syria. The bad guys are also on the side of the ‘rebels’, even though John Kerry, the feckless Secretary of State, says that the majority of them are ‘moderates’. Paleeeeeze! Does he really think we’re stupid? Well, most in the elitist political class do believe we’re dumb as a box of rocks, so it’s not surprising. I thought it was hilarious when Putin flat out called him a liar. Shoot, we’ve known that for quite a while now.
We have some facts, but not near enough to go to war over. It’s a fact that chemical weapons were used. The problem is, we don’t know which side used them. Most of the media, and the administration, say it was Assad. One or two of the talking heads will bring up the evidence that it was the ‘rebels’. Shoot, even the ‘rebels’ said they are the ones who used them, accidentally killing civilians. I don’t think they do anything by accident, except blow themselves up prematurely. We know there are a lot of foreigners who have joined the ‘rebels’. Foreigners, meaning they are NOT Syrians fighting against Assad’s forces to gain liberty from a dictatorship.
It’s also a fact that the ‘rebels’ have targeted Christians, slaughtering whole villages, and threatening more such actions. It’s a fact that it is Assad’s forces who are trying to protect the Christians against the brutality of the rebels. If Obama really wants to do something ‘noble’, he might consider sending in help to save the Christians in Syria from extermination. That would impress me! Of course, that won’t happen. He doesn’t care about them, even though he has professed to BE a Christian. I can profess to be a Lamborghini, and stand in the garage, but that don’t make it so! Since Obama has done nothing to help the Christians in Egypt who have been attacked on a regular basis, it’s pretty much a sure bet he won’t lift a finger to help the Syrian Christians.
It’s a fact that the ‘rebels’ summarily execute members of Assad’s army. Visual evidence is pretty convincing, in my humble opinion. We haven’t seen any evidence of Assad’s troops executing ‘rebels’ that have their hands bound behind their backs and on their knees when a bullet is put in the back of their heads. I’m not saying is hasn’t happened, but there’s been no eye witness accounts, or videos posted on YouTube.
It’s a fact that just a few years ago, Assad was hailed as a reformer, and doing the best he could for his people. Now, he’s a really bad guy, and must be removed. So, which is he? This is quite confusing. It’s my understanding, when this whole thing started, the actual Syrian rebels wanted a secular nation, with more freedom from the liberty crushing dictatorship. Now, it seems with so many foreign fighters joining in, the goal is an islamist state, rather like the Muslim Brotherhood imposed on Egypt, which has now been removed. The fighting continues in Egypt, with the Mosi supporters rioting, and the anti-islamists Morsi opposers and Christians being targeted. I see quite a few parallels, but perhaps, that’s just me.
It’s a fact there is no evidence that Syria is a threat to the United States’ national security. We do have issues right here at home that need to address that ARE a threat to our security, but since we have an administration that doesn’t much care for the U.S., or her citizens, this will never be of concern to them. Securing our borders would be a real good idea because that IS a threat, with drug thugs and terrorists sneaking over, not to mention the millions of illegal invaders, breaking our laws. But, once again, this administration ignores the laws of the land, and will only enforce the ones he likes.
No, bombing Syria is not a good idea, I don’t care what John McCain says. I also don’t care that he was playing poker during the Senate hearings. Hell, I would too! The droning of administration officials can get extremely boring.
Who knows where those bombs will hit! Granted, our troops are real good at what they do, but nothing is a sure thing. What if they do hit the chemical stockpiles? What about the civilians around the area? We’ll be accused of war crimes, even though it wouldn’t be intentional. If the only reason Obama wants to bomb Syria is to save face, then he’s a bigger fool than I thought, not to mention excessively egotistical! He states that it’s the Congress’ credibility that’s on the line, the world community, which doesn’t exist…anybody and everybody else would be at fault, even though HE IS the one that pulled out his crayon and drew the ‘red line’. He has made the U.S. a laughing stock. The world doesn’t trust him. Shoot, most thinking people don’t trust him. He is not a commander. He knows nothing about how to run, and win, a war. He’s basically knows nothing about how to run anything!
If Congress has any common sense, they will deny Obama’s request to ‘fire a shot across the bow’. Until we know who it is we’d be aiding, it would be foolish to butt our nose into Syria’s business. BOTH sides are the ‘bad guys’. It’s evil battling evil. Why should the U.S. aid evil? As Ted Cruz stated, the U.S. should not be al Qaeda’s air force! These are the same people who flew planes into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Shanksfield, PA murdering 2,976 men, women and children. No matter what they are calling themselves, they are all connected and are hell bent on slaughtering innocent people who don’t agree with them.
I can’t state it strongly enough. NO WAR WITH SYRIA….EITHER SIDE!!! Provide humanitarian aid if we must, although that’s what the U.N. is suppose to be doing, but we’re usually the ones footing the bill. Send the bill to Saudi Arabia, they have plenty of money, and should be aiding the refugees from Syria! But I will NOT support any military action that involved aiding islamists!
NO MEANS NO!
A year ago, President Barack Obama used the phrase “red line” twice, to make the point that Syria’s use of chemical weapons “would change my calculations significantly” on intervening in the civil war.
Let’s see…a video from August 21, 2012, uploaded by UK Telegraph:
But on Wednesday in Sweden — echoing comments made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday — Obama told reporters, “First of all, I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line. The world set a red line when governments representing 98 percent of the world’s population said the use of chemical weapons are abhorrent and passed a treaty forbidding their use even when countries are engaged in war.
He can always count on Pelosi, right or wrong! Now, we have another video from UK Telegraph, uploaded December 4, 2012.
“Congress set a red line when it ratified that treaty,” and when it passed the Syria Accountability Act, Obama added.
It’s Congress’ fault he said the words? Gotcha. So, it’ll be Congress’ fault if they approve this foolish action, and it goes south. Makes perfect sense from a guy that’s never taken responsibility for ANYTHING, but credit for things he didn’t do. Do ya ever get dizzy listening to this guy? Watching his antics? I sure do.
“And so when I said in a press conference (last year), that my calculus about what’s happening in Syria would be altered by the use of chemical weapons, which the overwhelming consensus of humanity says is wrong, um — that wasn’t something I just kind of made up. I didn’t pluck it out of thin air. There’s a reason for it.”
Well, yes, the Geneva Convention was quite explicit when it came to the use of mustard gas during WWI. I don’t think they had a clue that there would be a rise in evil, as in the muslims, who refused to play by the rules laid out nearly 100 years ago. Honor isn’t part of their vocabulary, except when it comes to murdering their wives and daughters.
However, it WAS Barack Hussein Obama who used the words ‘red line’, and it was him making the threats to hold Asad accountable, whether or not he was the one who was using the WMD. So, after knowing the weapon was used the first time, Obama did nothing. That red line turned pink. Now that it’s been done a second time, he’s allowing the bad guys, whichever side it may be cuz they’re BOTH bad guys, move these weapons around, get them out of the line of sight, leave the area, whatever. Even I know ya don’t tell the enemy what you are planning to do, but I guess since Obama is a rank amateur, he hasn’t learned that lesson.
“We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”
That would be the same regime that Pelosi snuck off to meet with without approval? And the one with whom Kerry chowed down? The regime that was referred to as a ‘reformer’? THAT regime? Oh yes…it’s all becoming so clear now.
…McCain, Graham, and BO
Only 5 reasons? Well, I’ll give Congress one more reason….everything Obama has laid a finger on since he was sworn in as POTUS has turned to pure caca!! From the economy, to Libya, we have seen nothing positive come out of this regime! The best thing he could do right now, since we can’t turn back the clock, is to sit down and STFU! His mouth has spewed more crap than a garbage truck in NYC! And please, for the love of all that’s holy…take away his crayons!
The fact that Pelosi AND Bonehead are supporting this fiasco should be all the American people need to know. Since the whole world knows that Obama has no support, financial or militarily, from the international community, I guess he needs a few lapdogs to make him feel better. It won’t do a damn thing to solve the ‘crisis’, but he’ll sure be patting himself on the back because he got a RINO in his corner. Yeah…great reason to bomb a country.
There is no imminent threat to U.S. national security in Syria, but we do have one on our own borders. How ’bout we bomb there instead? Makes about as much sense!
120,000 people have been killed over the course of this civil unrest, and Obama had no concern for them. An entire Christian village was slaughtered, but no one says a word. One side or the other, and honestly, I am leaning towards the so called rebels on this, use chemical weapons, and FINALLY Obama notices? Didn’t he notice the last time? Was it just in recent weeks that he was paying attention, or has he been too busy out on the links, and jetting around the world, on our dime, to take note of the thousands who have died, on both sides?
If the Saudis want to foot the bill, and send their own sons and daughters to fight, then let them. If Jordon is concerned, they can damn sure cough up the money and a few of their kids. If ANYONE in the Arab world gives a damn, then they should step up. But alas, they don’t care. Muslims killing muslims? I have no problem either. Sending our kids to do THEIR dirty work? Oh, you can bet I care… a LOT! Our troops have been stretched so thin, have been decimated by Obama’s policies, and treated like dirt by this administration. Do you really think they give a damn either?
I guess you could say I am 100% against this action! We can’t afford it, our troops are worn out, and every time Obama gets involved, we end up supporting the WRONG side. With Syria, there is no right so, so why put ourselves in the middle of the whole shebang? Makes NO sense!!
But at least we now know where Saddam sent his WMDs! Those pictures Powell took to the U.N. were pretty dead on, weren’t they.
5 Reasons Congress Should Press Obama on Syria
Brett Schaefer – The Foundry
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) both endorsed military action in Syria yesterday, but it’s unclear whether President Obama has sufficient support in Congress for a resolution authorizing such action.
House and Senate hearings this week give Members of Congress an opportunity to question the Obama Administration on Syria and its strategy—and question they should. Here are just five reasons Congress should press the Administration for answers.
I was curious what some folks were saying about the Syria situation, so since I haven’t read too many recently due to…well…anyways… I thought I’d take a peek at some of the opinions ’round about.
A couple of days ago we have something a bit prophetic, don’cha think?
Angy White Dude has a question.
Glad I’m not the only one who is concerned about the ‘horn tooting’. I don’t trust ‘em either!
When even the Brits won’t go along with the dude, you know he’s definitely reaping what he has sown!
Here, we get a VERY chilling question.
When Obama pulled out his red crayon, and talked about lines, Christian leaders in Egypt want to know…where is THEIR red line.
If you’ve been watching the news, you’ll know they ALL keep saying that it was Asad that used chemical weapons on his own people. Well, Walid Shoebat begs to differ. Wouldn’t it be a good idea to get to the bottom of just WHO used the weapons before going off half cocked, and giving support to the terrorists?
Here it’s all broken down for ya!
Is it possible that this so called commander in chief really wants our Christian sons and daughters to fight and die for people who want to kill our Christian sons and daughters?
Obama’s “viagra”? Cute.
First ‘viagra’, now stoneless? I’m getting very confused.
Iran’s threats should be of concern to everyone, but we all know that Obama doesn’t give a damn about Israel, OR the U.S.
Thanks to Obama’s feckless policies, we can’t afford to bomb Syria. I don’t think popguns would do the trick, do you?
And you KNOW what the “commander in chief” did after his little speech today, right? What he always does! FORE!!
Obama is so hot to bomb Syria, aiding the same people (jihadists) who were responsible for the murder of four Americans in Benghazi. I suppose to an anti American president, it makes sense. But to THIS pro American citizen, it is more than a little disturbing.
There’s lots more out there, but I’m hungry… for a change… so I’m gonna munch on a nice buttery corn cob!
Perhaps Obama should have taken a stronger stand when the whole works hit the fan…a couple of years ago? I wonder if Valerie wouldn’t let him, or advised him not to, or maybe she told him to stamp his foot, whine, and draw a line with his red crayon?
What the people in this country need to realize is what the rest of the world already knows…we do NOT have a Commander in Chief. We have, as Judge Jeanine put it, a ‘paper tiger’. Shoot, I wouldn’t even call him a tiger, paper or otherwise. What we have, ladies and gentlemen, is a major wuss, a pantywaiste, taking up space in the White House, spending money like a…tin pot dictator, and destroying what few liberties we had left.
Should we care that women and children are being killed? Yes, we should, no matter the method, but it seems we are selective in our outrage. How many died in Rwanda, and we did nothing? How many died in the Sudan, and we did nothing? How many women and children are being brutalized in EVERY muslim country, and we do NOTHING? (Let’s not forget the MILLIONS of children that have been ripped apart in the most brutal manner right here in the U.S. of A.!) Yet now, because there were supposedly (and I don’t doubt there were) chemical weapons involved, Chicken Little wants to throw a few bombs at the country, and say, “See? I’m a tough guy!”?
The biggest problem I see is that we honestly do not know WHO used those weapons. Reports confirm they were used, but the who is in dispute. Of course, because the Useless Numnuts don’t like Asad, they say his forces did it. Is he even in the country? Hmmm… Then there are other reports, obviously ignored by the administration, and ALL the media, with the exception of a few internet sources, that say the ‘rebels’ have WMDs stashed under a variety of houses in the area. Why ignore this information, and not even take it into consideration? Because this administration is actually on the side of the jihadists? Well, that would be my first thought. Honestly, I’m more inclined to believe Walid Shoebat over the UN and this feckless administration.
Perhaps this rebellion started with the hopes of getting the boot off the neck of the common folks, but it has since morphed into another islamists ‘Arab Spring’…summer….winter….fall. They have no problem killing themselves, and any innocents, all in the name of some made up god. They’ve said so!
So, do we bomb Syria? NO. Do we aid the ‘rebels’? HELL NO. The enemy of our enemy is still our enemy, especially when it comes that THAT part of the world. Do we aid Asad? Pfft! Paleeeeze! So, what do we do? Not a damn thing! Let them kill each other off! I don’t see any Arab countries stepping up to the plate…they never do! Nope. It’s the Western countries that lose their young men and women attempting to ‘save’ a muzzie country from themselves. No one in the region ever condemns the brutality of their fellow muslims. Why would they? They are just as brutal. And hey, let’s not forget the push to brutalize young Christian girls…their imans says it’s okie dokie.
Ok, so what’s the answer? Get what few Christians are left in the country OUT, and let the muzzies blow themselves up. When evil fights evil…there is no right side.
What to Do in Syria
Amy Payne – The Foundry
Reports are rampant that the Obama Administration will call for U.S. missile strikes against the regime in Syria at any time now.
That country is embroiled in a civil war, with opposition forces fighting dictator Bashar al-Assad. The U.S. has interests to protect in the region, but becoming directly involved in this civil war isn’t the answer, Heritage experts say. And the question of what to do in the conflict isn’t as simple as giving aid to the Syrian people, because Islamist terrorist groups are blending with the opposition and jockeying for power.
Heritage Middle East expert James Phillips has called the Obama Administration’s policy on Syria “a strategic and moral failure.” Here, Phillips and Heritage’s E. W. Richardson Fellow, James Carafano, answer some key questions about the Obama Administration’s current decision point.
Sure hope Bob took his BP meds. (a couple of thoughts below)
A couple of things here. Obviously, the Middle East is not a continent, but I knew what he was talking about. Second item….does no one else remember that Colin Powell went to the U.N. with photos of trucks going from Iraq into Syria? Now, it might just be me, but I think Hussein, as in Saddam, not Barack, shipped what he had into that country before we had a chance to do a whack a mole on ‘em. Just a thought.