An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings

Archive for Taxes

Don’t Think There Is Media Bias?

12 March 2010, 3:21 pm (1 hour ago). No Comments. Filed under 1st Amendment, Feckless Weasels, Opinion, Politics, Pond Scum, Taxes.

Think again!

On 27 February 2009, thousands all across the country gathered together to protest what was being seen as a violation of the U.S. Constitution, massive spending, and a major decline of our liberties.  The coverage of such rallies was spotty at best, and none existent in most cases.  Even CNN’s Howard Kurtz admits the lack on the part of the media to cover the TEA Parties.  But when it comes the leaning far left group, Coffee Party, well now, that’s a whole ‘nuther kettle of fish, isn’t it.  Wow.  People who have never been involved in the political process before, who were made fun of barely a year ago, called “astroturf”, and a few names that shouldn’t be repeated in polite company, on that same cable “news” network, are now hailing people who have never been involved in the political process is now being promoted.  Uh huh.

This new group calls for civility, objects to obstructionism and demands that politicians be held accountable to the people who put them in office.

Not one arrest at the TEA Parties, except for attacking leftists/SEIU/union thugs, egged on by Obama’s own words, yet the implication is that TEA Partiers have not been civil. Got it.  Naturally, the SEIU lied about the incident, but did the media cover that part?  Good thing people make use of the video feature of their cells phones, isn’t it.  It use to be a “picture is worth a thousand words”.  Now, it’s a “video will take you DOWN”.  :D

Kind of a shame that all the videos of Obama showing his true colors, red/purple/yellow, didn’t dissuade the clueless. If they had, perhaps there wouldn’t have been a need for all the Tea Parties? Naw….we’d still see the need because McLame, while not quite as bad, would still have overseen to the expansion of the federal government.

  • Share/Bookmark

Turn Off The Spigot!

12 March 2010, 12:30 pm (4 hours ago). No Comments. Filed under Economy, Moonbats & Other Animals, Opinion, Socialism, Taxes, The ONE.

Government Dependency Grows As “Non-paying” Taxpayers Hits Record Level

The Tax Foundation recently released its annual report on the number of tax returns filed that have no tax liability, and the study shows a record number of “nonpayers” in 2008. Taxpayers become “non-payers” when credits and deductions wipe out any income tax they owe.

Politicians have so totally screwed up the tax system, the only way to “fix it” will be to totally scrap the entire thing.  Many advocate for Fair Tax.  While I don’t disagree that if we have to have a tax system on a federal level, which I honestly question quite often, it should be fair.  I’m also of the mind it should be flat.  Example, no matter what your income, 10%.  Companies, individuals, rich, poor, billionaires, welfare queens…… doesn’t matter.  10%.

The amount of income that a family can earn and still be non-payers is also alarming. In 2010, a family of four can earn up to $51,000 and still pay no income taxes.

$51K?  Seriously?  That’s a nice income, and there are people who don’t pay diddly?

Not only do a record number of taxpayer’s pay no taxes, but many of them actually receive cash payments through the tax code because of refundable credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit. According to the Tax Foundation, cash payments from these two credits alone totaled over $70 billion.

Now, while it’s always nice to get a check in the mail, shouldn’t you actually DO something to earn it, other than make babies?  Granted, kids are expensive, but they can be raised without all the ‘must have’ items, like I-Pods, cell phones, $200 butt ugly sneakers, etc.

President Obama’s policies will add to the numbers of non-payers and the amount of income redistributed because he wants to expand and add even more refundable credits.

Yeah, that makes a whole lot of sense, doesn’t it.  Washington is spending like the proverbial drunken sailors after a year at sea, and yet, they want to take in less taxpayer dollars to pay for it.  Oh yeah.  Lot of economic logic there.  :?   Are these people so clueless, they can’t even balance a checkbook?  Without deposits, you can’t write the check.  Oh, wait a minute, this IS the excessively liberal>progressive>socialist>communist powers that be in D.C.  Silly me!

The growing dependency on government and shrinking number of taxpayers is troubling and will lead to an even faster rise in unsustainable government spending unless the trend is reversed. Congress should start by ceasing the expansion of refundable tax credits. It should then reform entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare before baby-boomers start collecting benefits from them and dependency on government explodes even further. If Congress starts soon perhaps it won’t be too late to stop the impending fiscal implosion.

How about we faze out all those damn ‘entitlement programs’?  NO one is entitled to dick!  Do you job, earn your paycheck, put as much as possible in some sort of savings, decide what is more important, that 64″ flat screen TV, or your future, and learn to live within your means!  Do I want old folks to go hungry?  Of course not.  Do I believe the taxpayers should provide for anyone, including me, an income just because they had the misfortune to live much longer than was ever intended?  Oh HELL no!  Once upon a time, families would band together, look after their elderly parents, as their parents had looked after them when they were younger.  That whole “Honor thy father and thy mother” was taken real serious for hundreds of generations.  Well, until the “progressives” came to power.

Exodus 20:12 Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Ok, I can hear it now….”But some parents aren’t such model citizens, and shouldn’t be honored.”  Yes, I know.  Some people shouldn’t breed, period.  Those types sure as hell shouldn’t be supported by taxpayer dollars either!  I can think of a few rather creative ways to deal with parents who abuse their children.  Supporting them in their old age is NOT one of them!

We can no longer afford all these social programs at the taxpayers expense.  We just can’t.  It’s past time to re-evaluate how the the whole system works.  It’s WAY past time to repeal the 16th Amendment!

  • Share/Bookmark

A Letter To The Census Bureau

11 March 2010, 10:38 pm. 4 Comments. Filed under 2010, Feckless Weasels, Taxes.

This letter is a copy and paste I received via email. This is real letter, written by a real person.  Obviously, I’m not including personal information, other than Herr Director’s, just the text:

Mr. Robert M. Groves
Director, U. S. Census Bureau.
Washington, D. C. 20233-0001

Dear Mr. Groves:

I have received your form notification that I will be receiving the 2010 Census form shortly. I appreciate your polite request that I fill it out and respond quickly. I will therefore respond as politely as I can with my criticisms.

First of all, your announced purpose for the Census and how it will be used violates the authority conferred by the United States Constitution. The authority to conduct a census every ten years was created by the People upon ratifying the Constitution in 1788. The specific purpose was to provide a count to support the apportionment among the states for authorizing representatives to Congress. The one other purpose allowed was to support the laying of capitation taxes, in Article 1, Section 9. There was no other purpose listed, and no other purpose is therefore authorized.

The specific wording is: “Article 1, § 1, Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States…, according to their respective Numbers… The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.”

It says “In such manner,” not “for such purposes as they shall by law direct.”

Your list of purposes – “Results from the 2010 Census will be used to help each community gets its fair share of government funds for highways, schools, health facilities and many other programs you and your neighbors need.”

Lord it is hard to remain polite when I see you telling me what I need. What I need from the federal government is enumerated in Article 1, Section 8. In every other respect, leave me alone. Just go away, for God’s sake. Please. We did not form this government to take from some of us and hand out to others.

You and your government co-bureaucrats have overstretched your authority in every way imaginable, and it has turned into a tyrannic chaos. And expensive beyond human comprehension.

Let me tell you what you need. You need the location for which I am answering. You need the names and ages of the citizens residing in the identified location. That is all.

You do not need the names or numbers of aliens. You do not need the character of the structure, its plumbing, or whether I have an internet connection. You for sure have no business digging into my finances. The same goes for all the rest of your questions.

You also need to stop spending my tax dollars on ink and paper, multiplied millions of times, on alien language announcements and services. If you were interested in serving my pre-American heritage, you blew it anyway – none of your gibberish included French or Gaelic instructions.

And you bungled one other thing. The town I live in is NOT (name of city & state). You got the street and zip code correct, but (zip code) is (name of town). (name of town) is in the next county over. If you bungle that, what good is it going to do to give you my unrequired information, anyway?

So – just stick to what the Constitution authorized. Think of how proud we will all be that you kept your oath to uphold the Constitution. And how you cut your budget and saved us all that tax money.

With a few exceptions that includes the details, I think this is a pretty good letter.  I wonder how those folks up in D.C. would react if MILIONS of such letters arrived on their doorstep?

We had our ‘first class’ To Resident of…. letter waiting for us in the mail when we got home today.  Haven’t bothered to even open it.  Just noticed that “first class’.  If they really had to mail this crap out, wasting our money, couldn’t they have done a mass media rate, or some such?

  • Share/Bookmark

An FYI Update

8 March 2010, 10:23 pm. No Comments. Filed under Dhimmicrats, Feckless Weasels, Taxes, Tennessee.

Since I forgot to link the actual bill pushing to add a tax to the “complimentary breakfast” nonsense, Why Can’t We Tax Stupidity?, I thought I’d include a little more info, which I also forgot to include.  Yeah.  It’s an old age thing.  Or can I blame it on Monday?  Hmmm…

SB 3901 – introduced by Senator Jim Kyle, D-Memphis, District 28 — Part of Shelby County

HB 3787 – introduce by Rep. Mike Turner, D-Old Hickory, District 51 — Part of Davidson County

What a shocker!  Democrats want to raise taxes during tough economic times.

  • Share/Bookmark

Fired Up? How ‘Bout Just FIRED!

8 March 2010, 8:55 pm. 4 Comments. Filed under Dhimmicrats, Feckless Weasels, Health Care, Politics, Senate, Socialism, Taxes.

Specter: Democrats getting ‘angry,’ will pass healthcare bill

Democrats in Congress are getting “angry” enough to push through healthcare reform, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) said today.

Speaking to reporters after President Barack Obama’s healthcare event outside Philadelphia on Monday, Specter said frustration over Republican “obstruction” is making his caucus determined to move ahead.

Ya know what? I don’t care if the Democrats are getting angry. They can get angry all they want. What I DO care about is the fact they are NOT representing the interests of their constituents. 20% strongly favor this crap. TWENTY PERCENT! The AMERICAN people do not want these morons in D.C., who can’t even control their own lives, control ours. IT’S NOT IN THEIR JOB DESCRIPTION!

“I think there’s a lot more determination in the Congress now to get it passed,” he said, according to a pool report. “I really think there’s sort of reaction on the Democratic side of getting a little angry over the duration and intensity of obstruction and a lot more determination to see it through.”

In this case, the Democrat definition of “obstruction” is the Republicans remember who pays their salaries. Uh…Arlen…. ol’ buddy, ol’ pal??? That would be WE, THE PEOPLE!

“The president’s providing for more fiery leadership now,” Specter said.

“That’s the most fiery I’ve seen him since the early campaign,” he added. “When I was listening to him, I wished that he had given that in the State of the Union. If it’s the State of the Union he would have reached a lot more people.”

Oh, I’m quite sure Obama is all fired up. There are still a few folks who believe his lies, but the number is getting smaller and smaller.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why Can’t We Tax Stupidity?

8 March 2010, 7:50 pm. 1 Comment. Filed under Opinion, Taxes, Tennessee.

Hotels: “Not the right time” for tax on free breakfast

A chance to start the day at the breakfast bar inside Country Inn & Suites Cedar Bluff is one of the ways the west Knoxville hotel gets customers to stay the night.

“Complimentary breakfasts are a big draw. A lot of people travel and want their breakfasts included in their rate. That’s what we do,” said Country Inn and Suites Cedar Bluff General Manager Joe Valentino.

Who comes up with this stuff? Seriously!

Though all their hotels offer free breakfast, the meals’ cost get reflected in the room rates. The complimentary breakfasts cost his company more than a thousand dollars a week.

“[It costs] four to five thousand dollars a month for your typical focus-service hotel,” Valentino said.

That price tag may soon increase.

Ok, first off, there is really no such thing as a “free lunch”. Or, in this case, “free” complimentary breakfast. Does it not occur to the bozo who came up with this not so bright idea that the cost of the food is already added into the cost of the room, and therefore, has ALREADY been taxed.

State lawmakers are considering a bill that would add sales tax to the free breakfasts.

Valentino points out that his company pays sales tax when the food is bought.

The proposed legislation would also tax it when it’s eaten.

Are they going to tax it when it comes out, as well as goes in?  Oh, wait a minute.  They already do that too!  Every time you flush, you are paying tax on the utilities, etc.

According to the Tennessee Department of Revenue Commissioner Reagan Farr, “This proposal prevents erosion of our sales tax base because of judicial decisions and sets Tennessee back in line with the majority of states collecting this revenue.”

You mean Tennessee is suppose to double, and triple tax visitors to the state? Oh yeah, makes LOADS of sense. Will bring right on in, won’t it. Big business when you tax your average family heading to Dollywood, into having them rethink their plans.

Farr says he doesn’t expect the cost will affect consumers, but industry insiders say the opposite.

“It has to be passed on to the consumer. You can’t continue to absorb those costs or you’re out of business,” said Knoxville Tourism Alliance Executive Director Jill Thompson.

Since I’m one of those people who never eats the “free” breakfast, do I get taxed too? Why? I’m not making use of the food. Why should I pay an extra tax?

Thompson argues the added sales tax would soften the state’s competitive edge in the tourism industry, and at the very least, would pose new challenges to companies like Valentino’s which have already taken an economic hit.

The whole country is taking an economic hit. It’s affecting how people travel, and take vacations. They are staying closer to home. Add more taxes, and you might find people, not only staying closer to home, but at home.

“This is not the right time to do it. I don’t think there is a right time to do it. This will definitely impact decisions we make in the future,” Valentino said.

You can NOT tax your way into prosperity! I keep trying to talk the Mr into heading to Gatlinburg for a few days, or maybe a week. Lots to see over that way, and it’s really pretty. If we have to pay an extra tax at the motel, I’m rethinking my harassment about this. He’ll be pleased.

H/T: Mr Ol’ Broad

  • Share/Bookmark

“Comprehensive”? To Whom?

8 March 2010, 10:40 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Borders, Congress, Crime, Illegals, Opinion, Socialism, Taxes.

The NEW Amnesty Bill
Amnesty For Illegal Aliens On The Way Back To Congress
‘Comprehensive’ Immigration Bill That Includes Amnesty.
‘Pathway to Citizenship’ for Illegal Aliens.

by J. D. Longstreet

Just a couple of tiny snippets:

Well, this week, the President will be meeting with Shumer and Graham for a progress report on the immigration bill they have been working on.

I think we all are aware of what “revised” means to the Obama Regime. Think ObamaCare and ObamaCare 2.0. The latter was supposed to be the revised bill. It was, in fact, the original bill with a couple, or three, Republican suggestions thrown in to make it more palatable to the GOP and the American people. But, as nobody has actually seen a hard copy of the bill, doubt remains that ObamaCare 2.0 even exists.

(…)

I shouldn’t have to ask this question, but it seems I must. Have you stopped to consider how many millions more will pile onto “the dole” US taxpayers will have to support if this NEW amnesty bill passes? 12 million is a drop in the bucket to the REAL figure, which you are NOT going to hear bandied about by this administration, nor the democrat/progressive/socialists in the Congress.

Just as we believe the REAL unemployment figure is closer to 20% than it is to the 9.7% being reported by the government, and the number of jobs lost last month, we believe, is closer to 50,000 than it is to the 36,000 the government reported, we believe the real figure representing illegal aliens in America today is closer to 36 million than to the 12 million, or so, the government has been reporting.

Read the entire post here.

My first response:  Are they flippin’ insane?  Then I realized, this is a rhetorical question. Of course they are. No one who has an tiny fraction of sanity would even consider a move like this, so they must be insane.

Second response: Lindsay Graham doesn’t like working in Washington.  Throw in this, and you’ve got a veritable Democrat in RINO clothing.  Wait a minute, I’m repeating myself.  Hmm….

I know, I’m going to get all the usual “raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacist” crap, but I don’t give a flip. Call me what you want, but when it comes down to MY home, I don’t much care for people breaking in, and stealing what little I’ve got left.  Got it?

What it all boils down to…. “We will give you a vote, if you vote for us!”  It’s a power thing.  Had absolutely NOTHING to do with all those ‘poor people who are just searching for a better life’!  Yeah, at the tax payer’s expense in quite a few cases.  Oh, I know there are some who really DO want to work hard, provide for their families, but those folks are the ones who usually go through the LEGAL process, and are pushed aside in favor of their ILLEGAL ‘cousins’.

J.D. goes on:

No, they are not nuts. As we have learned, they just don’t care what you and I think, or want, or NOT want, as the case may be. We don’t count with the current government. They are far smarter than we. They know far better than we what is good for us.There is very little fear of our dissenting votes in Washington, anymore.

The progressive/socialists have managed to secure the votes of the less literate among us in such large numbers as to override our dissenting votes. We warned, months ago, that the progressive/socialists had dispatched armies of “helpers/organizers” into the field to register “new” voters from among those whose livelihood depends on the government check they receive the first of each month. And it worked in 2008.

We can NOT let it work again in 2010, or 2012. If we don’t put a stop to this reckless behavior of our so called representatives, the United States of America, will likely, be no more. And that’s just not acceptable!

  • Share/Bookmark

Parental Instructions

5 March 2010, 2:46 pm. No Comments. Filed under Taxes.

If your young’un comes home from school, instructing YOU what to do….whack his backside, pack his/her bags, and tell him to get a job!

Homework: Get Your Parents To Fill out the Census

The U.S. Census Bureau has launched an aggressive campaign to get school children to influence their parents to participate in the 2010 Census. This is part of a $13 billion national public information effort, and will reach about 56 million students in 118,000 schools. The plan is to disseminate posters, maps, teaching guides and lesson plans to every school in the nation. Schools will have a Census Week shortly before the Census questionnaires are delivered to residential addresses this month. During Census Week, teachers will spend 15 minutes each day talking about civic participation. Extensive lesson plans for grades K-12 are designed to integrate census-related information into subjects such as history and math. The aim is to persuade children to persuade their families to be sure and fill out the census information. Teachers will emphasize the benefits of Census participation. Census population counts will determine how many Members of Congress each state will have in Congress and how much federal money each congressional District will get.

Article 1, Sec.2: (in part)

The actual Enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct.

For the ill informed, enumeration: to ascertain the number of. You know….count. Like, “Hey…how many people live in your house?”  THIRTEEN BILLION OF OUR TAX DOLLARS! Oh yeah…makes LOADS of sense, doesn’t it!

First off, considering the excessive spending of this administration, and it’s minions in Congress, is this such a wise use of OUR money? What am I saying? NOTHING the federal government does when it comes to spending is “wise”.

Second, contrary to what the liberals in education would like to believe, and are doing their best to accomplish, they are NOT our children’s parents!

The 2010 Census appears to have only 10 questions.  In reality, it only needs ONE:  How many people live in your home? Maybe ages should be included, but I don’t think that’s necessary either.  So, if there are supposedly only 10 questions, what the heck is this?  Whole lot of questions about race, don’t ya think?  (Uh…what happened to the ‘post-racial’?  Yeah, that’s what I thought.)

Housing?  Income?  What does all this have to do with how many people live in this country?  Oh, wait a minute!  There should be one specific question, right at the beginning of this so called census:  Are you a legal resident of the United States of America?  If yes, please continue.  In English.  If answer is no, get your ass back to where you came from!  Do not pass go, do not collect $200!

  • Share/Bookmark

Economic War – Obama Versus The Real World

5 March 2010, 11:45 am. No Comments. Filed under Economy, Opinion, Politics, Taxes, The ONE.

So, How’s That Pivot to Jobs Going?
The Foundry

Last week President Barack Obama hosted a seven-and-a-half-hour televised health care summit. This week the President launched his “final” campaign for passage of his health care plan. Next week, President Obama will travel to Missouri and Pennsylvania to continue this “final” effort to jam his unpopular plan through Congress. With this all-health-care-all-the-time White House agenda it seems like eons ago that the Obama administration announced, following the complete rejection of its health care plan in the Massachusetts Senate special election,  that President Obama’s first State of the Union would mark a “pivot” from health care and to a “razor sharp focus on jobs”. So how is that pivot to jobs going? Well, the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly jobs report this morning and it showed the U.S. economy shed another 36,000 net jobs last month. Our nation’s unemployment rate is still at 9.7%.

Read on…

  • Share/Bookmark

There Is No Sanity In D.C.’s Wonderland

1 March 2010, 10:17 am. No Comments. Filed under Economy, Opinion, Taxes.

The Edifice Falls
The Foundry

Having failed to convince the country that we should reorder one-sixth of our economy (health care) in one fell swoop, liberals in the Administration and Congress are now doubling down and moving on to the next big thing. This time it’s the transformation of everything, through climate legislation. One could almost stand agape, admiring the boldness of the overreach, were not so much prosperity at stake.

Read on…

  • Share/Bookmark

Wanna Get Rich? Work For The Gub’mint!

24 February 2010, 1:54 pm. 2 Comments. Filed under Economy, Opinion, Taxes.

Obama’s federal jobs

Employment is up, wages are up, and job security is as firm as ever. Unfortunately, this is only true for federal government workers.

And who pays these wages?

President Obama is presiding over the largest federal work force in decades. In the current fiscal year, the number of civilian workers will grow by 153,000, to 1.43 million. These are the only jobs Mr. Obama can legitimately claim to have created. Unfortunately, they are subsidized by deficit spending.

Oh yeah.  Putting the taxpayers further into debt by creating jobs paid for by the taxpayers makes total sense.  /snark

Federal positions are not shovel-ready make-work jobs, either. Working for Uncle Sam pays extremely well these days. Government employment used to be a calling, a career in which a sense of fulfillment from public service offset low pay and spartan working conditions. Not so today. According to a study by the Cato Institute, 2008 federal worker pay-and-benefits packages averaged $119,982. That’s more than double the private-sector average of $59,909.

When we all become government employees, who is going to pay our salaries?  To misquote Margaret Thatcher, “The problem with socialism is eventually, you run out of other people’s money.”  Will the income tax be raised to 75% on salaries just so we can all pay each other?  But what is actually being produces by these government jobs that is really worth anything?  What goods are being manufactured? Not a dadburn thing!

In the Defense Department, which is adding the most new workers, the number of civilian employees earning more than $150,000 jumped from 1,868 in December 2007 to 10,100 in June 2009. Many highly paid Defense Department employees are retired members of the military who receive full pensions in addition to salary. This “double dipping” is extra costly for taxpayers.

Excuse me while I clean the coffee off my monitor. ………………. Ok, now, let me read that again. 1,868 in 2007 increases to 10,100 in just two years? PLUS, many are getting a nice pension, from taxpayers, in addition to their nice fat salaries? Does anyone else see a major problem here?

Federal pay keeps growing even as overall private-sector compensation stagnates. In 2009, federal employees received an average pay raise of 3.9 percent, more than twice the 1.5 percent wage-and-benefit increase for private-sector employees – that is, for those who still had jobs. Mr. Obama proposed a 2 percent federal pay increase for fiscal 2010, down from a projected 2.4 percent rise. This was supposed to save approximately $20 billion, but a zero percent increase would have saved $120 billion.

I will grant you that many who work for the government are necessary. However, that being said, there are many more who are NOT! Eliminate the thumb suckers. You know the ones….the redundant, a large portion of the union workers at the IRS who sit around and file their nails instead of answering the phone, any number of Congressional staffers, etc.  Oh, hell.  Just get rid of the gooberment unions altogether!  Make folks actually save their own money for their retirement, like responsible grownups use to do not all that long ago.  That would save a WHOLE lot more than just the $20,000,000,000.

A federal pay freeze is a reasonable proposal in times of record budget deficits, especially when federal workers already make much more than their private-sector counterparts. However, this would require the president to make one of those hard choices he likes to talk about but studiously avoids. Feds who think they have a right to regular pay raises should contemplate the hardships of the millions of Americans recently forced to accept 100 percent pay cuts. And a 10 percent cut in the federal work force would save additional billions of dollars and still leave the government larger than it was when Mr. Obama took office. Those bonuses for bureaucrats should end, too.

Yep, the opinion folks at The Washington Times are almost as smart as me. Just without the same amount of sarcasm thrown in for good measure.  8)

Here are some interesting charts from the CBO, just in case you are interested. (.pdf)

  • Share/Bookmark

REAL Bad Medicine!

23 February 2010, 2:58 pm. 3 Comments. Filed under Congress, Dhimmicrats, Feckless Weasels, Taxes, The ONE.

Voters still strongly oppose the health care reform plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats and think Congress should focus instead on smaller bills that address problems individually rather than a comprehensive plan.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 41% of voters favor the proposed health care plan, while 56% oppose it. Those figures include 45% who strongly oppose the plan and just 23% who strongly favor it. (source)

  • Share/Bookmark

What Part Of NO…….

Democrats’ attempts to coordinate health-care message leave Republicans scratching their heads

President Obama’s attempt to press ahead with a comprehensive health-care bill on Monday prompted one reaction in Washington more than any other: confusion.

“I was actually surprised that they’re pushing it again. The most important thing is jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. We need to focus on jobs,” said Rep. Heath Shuler, North Carolina Democrat and a leader of the 54-member Blue Dog coalition of conservative Democrats.

I’m not surprised at all. The Dems don’t give a flip what the people of this country want, or don’t want. They are going to ram anything they can down our throats, like a mother giving a three year old castor oil, and telling ‘em it’s candy! Well, we aren’t 3 year olds, and we we KNOW it isn’t candy!

“I don’t think a comprehensive bill can pass,” he said.

“I hate to use a football analogy,” said the former Washington Redskins quarterback, “but first downs are a lot better than throwing the bomb route or the Hail Mary.”

Honestly, we don’t even want first downs. We want REAL reform, and will not settle. That includes opening up state borders and dealing with lawsuit abuse, of which, there is plenty! And by the way, y’all might want to consider dealing with all the fraud that’s been going on for decades, costing the taxpayer BILLIONS!

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, gave a sharp rebuttal to Shuler’s remark.

“You know what? With all due respect to everyone, we just saw the president’s proposal today. I don’t know that anybody in our caucus is saying we’re not going to pass a bill,” she told The Daily Caller as she left the caucus meeting.

“We will pass a bill. We will pass a bill,” she said.

Uh huh! We WILL sit your sorry hind end on the sidelines!

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, knocked down the idea that the president’s proposal represented a product that all Democrats were supporting unquestionably, undermining the White House argument that Republicans must unite behind one proposal before Thursday’s meeting at the White House.

“I’m not sure there is a ‘this bill.’ We have a bill. The Senate’s got a bill. The president has put a proposal on the floor. We’re going to talk on Thursday,” Hoyer said in an interview on his way out of the meeting.

Such happy horse manure! Talk? No, this dog and pony show is going to be the same old thing….the Dems preach, and the Republicans sit, with their thumbs up their butts, spinning for the folks back home. Grow a pair, people! A BIG pair! The “Party of NO” is a good thing when the proposed issue is destruction of the economy!

  • Share/Bookmark

When, In The Course Of Human Events….

…it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Obama to Seek Curbs on Insurance Hikes

Seeking to revive his stalled health-care legislation, President Barack Obama is proposing a new idea to address health costs, giving the federal government authority to block insurers from making premium rate increases.

Whoa! Hold on there Skippy! Where do you get off telling private companies what they can, and cannot do? Where in the Constitution does it state you have this authority?

The move raises the ante after two weeks of presidential bashing of rate increases including WellPoint Inc.’s decision to raise premiums for some California customers by as much as 39%. WellPoint has defended its price increase as unavoidable in light of rising health costs.

California. The land of fruits, nuts, flakes and socialists! Perhaps insurance companies wouldn’t have to keep increasing their rate if someone stepped back, and took a good hard look at the REAL problems that are plaguing the industry, eh?

Administration officials have said Monday’s proposal would be an effort to bridge the differences between the health bills passed by the House and the Senate last year. The idea for new federal authority on premiums wasn’t in either bill, and is likely to generate opposition from Republicans arguing that it would give too much power to the federal government.

We don’t need any more freakin’ federal authorities! Just the opposite! We NEED to get RID of a great many of those ‘authorities’ we already have screwing up our lives. If it ain’t in the Constitution, back the **** off!

The Democratic health bills already envision some role for the government to control premium costs, through new exchanges where individuals and small businesses could buy insurance. One version would prevent any insurer that raised rates beyond a level that the government deemed unfair from selling policies in the exchange.

Why don’t the Democrats come clean, and just change the name of their party to the Democratic Socialists?

A new seven-member Health Insurance Rate Authority, made up of industry experts, consumer representatives, a physician and others, would issue an annual report laying out what it viewed as reasonable rate increases. Those considered unjustified could be blocked by a federal board. Customers might even qualify for rebates.

More government employees, with a nice fat salary and all the benefits, at the taxpayers expense, picking and choosing, depending on which company donated the most to the commies? I don’t freakin’ think so!

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said on “Fox News Sunday” that Republicans intended to take part in Thursday’s televised summit, and he reiterated his call for Mr. Obama to scrap the Democrats’ bill. “The American people do not want this bill to pass,” he said.

I’d venture to guess that anyone with an “R” behind their name who attends Obumbler’s fiasco will find themselves in a real tough re-election. Grow a pair ya weasels! Do what is RIGHT for the people, not for that joke of a president and his cronies!

Hmmm… can ya tell I’m a tad annoyed?

We must separate ourselves from those who would do the greatest harm to the nation, and her people!

  • Share/Bookmark

WE, The People Said NO!

22 February 2010, 10:30 am. 1 Comment. Filed under Dhimmicrats, Economy, Health Care, Socialism, Taxes, The ONE.

The White House Learned Nothing from Massachusetts
The Foundry

In July of this year, the American people were mostly undecided about Obamacare: equal numbers opposed and supported the health care bills that the White House was shepherding through Congress. But then August happened and informed Americans turned out at townhalls across the country to express their strong disapproval of Obamacare. The larger American public noticed and pluralities of the American people began to oppose Obamacare. The White House concluded they had a “communications problem” so they scheduled a prime time speech in front of a rare Joint Session of Congress. But the President’s speech arrogantly dismissed the concerns of the American people and after a brief uptick in support (from the low 40s to the mid 40s), opposition to the President’s plan grew.

Read on…

  • Share/Bookmark